UE-Specific Guard Period Configuration for TDD Interference

Solution Overview

Problem

In time division duplex (TDD) systems, the configuration of the guard period (GP) is static and does not adapt to individual terminal devices, leading to inefficient resource allocation and interference between uplink and downlink signals, particularly in new radio (NR) systems where flexible resource configuration is needed.

Innovation Solution

A method for UE-level semi-static or dynamic configuration of the GP and flexible uplink-downlink resource allocation, where the access network device determines the required GP resource for terminal devices based on factors like uplink timing advance measurement and maximum coverage distance, and sends specific time domain resource configuration information to ensure uplink synchronization and minimize interference.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If cell-level static configuration of GP is used, then configuration simplicity is maintained, but resource allocation efficiency deteriorates and interference between uplink and downlink signals increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the cell-level GP configuration into two parts: a cell-level common GP configuration and a UE-specific GP configuration. The cell-level configuration provides the basic guard period resources, while the UE-specific configuration (via RRC signaling or DCI) allows individual terminals to receive additional or adjusted GP resources based on their specific needs, such as timing advance values or interference conditions. This segmentation enables both simplicity at the cell level and efficiency at the UE level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by allowing different GP configuration parameters (such as guard period length or guard period position) to be customized for different terminals based on their local conditions. For example, terminals with larger timing advance values or those experiencing specific interference patterns can be allocated different GP resources than terminals with smaller timing advance values, optimizing resource allocation for each local situation while maintaining overall system simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Device complexity

If cell-level static configuration of GP is used, then configuration simplicity is maintained, but interference between uplink and downlink signals increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the cell-level GP configuration into two parts: a cell-level common GP configuration and a UE-specific GP configuration. The cell-level configuration provides the basic guard period resources, while the UE-specific configuration (via RRC signaling or DCI) allows individual terminals to receive additional or adjusted GP resources based on their specific needs, such as timing advance values or interference conditions. This segmentation enables both simplicity at the cell level and efficiency at the UE level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by allowing different GP configuration parameters (such as guard period length or guard period position) to be customized for different terminals based on their local conditions. For example, terminals with larger timing advance values or those experiencing specific interference patterns can be allocated different GP resources than terminals with smaller timing advance values, optimizing resource allocation for each local situation while maintaining overall system simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If UE-level dynamic configuration of GP is implemented, then resource allocation efficiency is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the GP configuration into cell-level common parameters (configured via system information) and UE-specific parameters (configured via RRC signaling or DCI). The cell-level configuration establishes the basic framework with minimal complexity, while the UE-specific configuration adds dynamic optimization only where needed. This segmentation allows the system to achieve high resource allocation efficiency without requiring complete dynamic reconfiguration of all parameters for all terminals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial dynamic configuration by applying UE-specific GP configuration only to terminals that require it (e.g., those with specific timing advance values or interference conditions), rather than dynamically configuring all terminals. This partial action approach achieves the necessary resource allocation efficiency while avoiding the excessive complexity that would result from universal dynamic configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11902840B2Time domain resource configuration method and access network device
Publication Date: 2024.02.13
  • US11902840B2 patent drawing
  • US11902840B2 patent drawing
  • US11902840B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to time domain resource configuration methods and access network devices One example method includes determining a guard period (GP) resource required by a terminal device, where the GP resource required by the terminal device is a GP resource required by the terminal device for uplink synchronization with an access network device, and sending first time domain resource configuration information to the terminal device, where the first time domain resource configuration information indicates the GP resource required by the terminal device.