Uplink Interference Characterization via UE Transmission Mode Scheduling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In wireless communication systems with aggressive frequency reuse, high interference levels occur due to neighboring base stations decoding signals from multiple user equipment on the same time/frequency resources, leading to low signal-to-interference ratios at the base station receiver, which impairs link quality.

Innovation Solution

A method and system where a first base station communicates with a plurality of user equipment, selects a second base station, and schedules a user equipment to transmit according to a specific transmission mode, allowing the first base station to characterize interference during the transmission, thereby improving interference understanding and resource allocation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If aggressive frequency reuse is implemented to increase spectral efficiency, then frequency channel utilization is improved, but interference levels increase and signal-to-interference ratio deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespectral efficiencyVSAvoidinterference level
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes transmission parameters including frequency channel assignment, transmission mode (e.g., transmit diversity, spatial multiplexing, open loop spatial orthogonal multiplexing), and power levels based on real-time interference characterization. This allows the system to adapt to varying interference conditions while maintaining high spectral efficiency through aggressive frequency reuse.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If multiple user equipment transmit on the same time/frequency resources to increase system capacity, then resource utilization is improved, but interference at base station receiver increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem capacityVSAvoidsignal-to-interference ratio
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different transmission modes and interference mitigation techniques to different user equipment based on their specific interference environment. Each user equipment can be scheduled with an appropriate transmission mode tailored to its local conditions, allowing multiple users to share time/frequency resources effectively while managing interference through localized optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically schedules user equipment transmission modes based on real-time interference characterization and channel conditions. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to optimize resource allocation and transmission parameters continuously, enabling high system capacity through flexible resource sharing while maintaining acceptable signal-to-interference ratios through adaptive interference management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If interference characterization is improved to enhance resource allocation, then scheduling accuracy is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference characterization accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

User equipment perform self-measurement of interference conditions on assigned frequency channels and report measurements to the base station. This distributed measurement approach enables accurate interference characterization without requiring complex centralized measurement infrastructure, reducing overall system complexity while improving scheduling accuracy through precise interference data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where user equipment report interference measurements and channel quality indicators to the base station, which then adjusts resource allocation and transmission mode assignments accordingly. This feedback mechanism enables continuous optimization of resource allocation based on actual interference conditions while keeping system complexity manageable through standardized feedback protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9332455B2Scheduling a user equipment transmission mode to assist uplink interference characterization
Publication Date: 2016.05.03 HEADWATER PARTNERS I LLC
  • US9332455B2 patent drawing
  • US9332455B2 patent drawing
  • US9332455B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, and apparatuses for scheduling a user equipment transmission mode to assist uplink interference characterization are provided. One method includes a first base station (BS) wirelessly communicating with a first plurality of user equipment (UE), selecting a second BS associated with the first BS, the second BS wirelessly communicating with a second plurality of UE, selecting a UE from the second plurality of UE, scheduling the selected UE to transmit according to a transmission mode during a scheduled transmission, and characterizing, by the first BS, interference of the selected UE at the first BS during the scheduled transmission.