UE Lawful Intercept Configuration for Non-Terrestrial Roaming

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems face inefficiencies in complying with varying lawful intercept (LI) regulations across different countries, particularly for roaming devices in non-terrestrial networks, leading to increased network traffic and performance degradation due to the need for extensive message signaling and differential network element configurations.

Innovation Solution

A user equipment (UE) device proactively identifies the jurisdiction's LI requirements by querying a home network for modified operating procedures, using a LI modify parameter table stored in its memory, reducing the need for extensive message signaling by directly implementing LI compliance during initial registration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If extensive message signaling is used for LI compliance in roaming devices, then LI regulatory compliance is achieved, but network traffic increases and performance degrades

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveLI regulatory complianceVSAvoidnetwork traffic
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by having the UE proactively identify jurisdiction and determine LI requirements before actual communication occurs. The UE queries the home network for modified operating procedures in advance and receives LI configuration parameters during initial registration, eliminating the need for extensive subsequent message signaling. This upfront preparation resolves the contradiction by achieving compliance without continuous network traffic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If differential network element configurations are implemented for LI compliance, then LI regulatory compliance is achieved, but device complexity and configuration overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveLI regulatory complianceVSAvoidconfiguration overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by dynamically adjusting UE operating parameters based on jurisdiction-specific LI requirements. Instead of implementing complex differential configurations, the network provides modified operating procedure parameters (such as encryption settings, signaling formats) that the UE applies directly. This resolves the contradiction by achieving compliance through simple parameter adjustment rather than complex configuration changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250338131A1Lawful intercept compliance mechanism on non-terrestrial network-based services
Publication Date: 2025.10.30 AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I L P
  • US20250338131A1 patent drawing
  • US20250338131A1 patent drawing
  • US20250338131A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the subject disclosure may include, for example, a user equipment (UE) device operative for receiving, from a local network, a mobile country code identifying a jurisdiction in which the local network is located, identifying, in a memory of the UE device, a lawful intercept modify parameter associated with the jurisdiction, receiving, based on the lawful intercept modify parameter, regulatory requirements for implementing lawful intercept procedures by the UE device, and communicating with the local network according to the lawful intercept procedures. Other embodiments are disclosed.