UE Network Selection Using Operator Signal Threshold Criteria

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing network selection mechanisms in wireless communication systems often result in conflicts and unpredictable outcomes due to conflicting priorities between PLMN prioritization, cell-provided cell selection criteria, and access-technology-specific criteria, leading to suboptimal network choices and increased power consumption.

Innovation Solution

Implementing access-technology-specific signal-level thresholds and cell-provided cell selection criteria in conjunction with signal-quality centric mechanisms to guide UE network selection, allowing for more stable and efficient PLMN and serving cell choices based on operator-controlled criteria.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If PLMN prioritization is used for network selection, then higher priority networks are selected, but conflicts with access-technology-specific criteria lead to unpredictable selection outcomes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork selection consistencyVSAvoidselection criteria conflict
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the selection parameters by introducing access-technology-specific signal-level thresholds that override PLMN prioritization. Instead of selecting based on PLMN priority alone, the system evaluates signal metrics against technology-specific thresholds, making the selection criteria more deterministic and reducing conflicts between different selection mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring signal metrics and comparing them against access-technology-specific thresholds. This feedback mechanism allows the UE to make informed network selection decisions based on current signal conditions, ensuring consistent and predictable outcomes rather than relying solely on static PLMN prioritization lists.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If periodic PLMN selection is performed to find higher priority networks, then network priority is optimized, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork priority optimizationVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies periodic action by performing network selection at scheduled intervals rather than continuously. The UE conducts PLMN selection periodically based on configured thresholds and signal metrics, which reduces unnecessary measurements and processing while still ensuring that higher priority networks are discovered when available. This periodic approach balances network optimization with power conservation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by using access-technology-specific signal-level thresholds to trigger network selection events. Instead of performing periodic selection regardless of signal conditions, the UE evaluates current signal metrics against thresholds and only initiates selection when criteria are met, reducing unnecessary power consumption while maintaining network priority optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple selection criteria (PLMN prioritization, cell selection criteria, access-technology criteria) are used, then comprehensive network evaluation is achieved, but selection outcomes become unpredictable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork evaluation comprehensivenessVSAvoidselection outcome predictability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the network selection process into distinct evaluation stages: first evaluating access-technology-specific signal-level thresholds, then PLMN prioritization, and finally cell selection criteria. This segmentation creates a hierarchical decision framework where each criterion is applied in a specific order, making the overall selection process more predictable while maintaining comprehensive evaluation capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by establishing a clear priority hierarchy among selection criteria. Access-technology-specific signal-level thresholds are evaluated first and can override PLMN prioritization, creating a deterministic evaluation flow. This parameter ordering ensures that while multiple criteria are considered, the selection outcome remains predictable based on the established evaluation sequence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP4515954B1Network selection with signal-level criteria and operator controlled signal threshold criteria
Publication Date: 2026.02.25 GOOGLE LLC
  • EP4515954B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4515954B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4515954B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3C

AI summary

This disclosure provides systems, methods, and apparatus, including computer programs encoded on computer-readable media, for a network selection by a user equipment (UE) in a wireless communication system. The UE obtains access-technology-specific signal-level criteria that include at least a first technology-specific signal-level threshold for a first access technology (1110). The UE selects one or more a public land mobile networks (PLMNs) that include one or more candidate cells having signal metrics satisfying network selection criteria that is based, at least in part, on the first technology-specific signal-level threshold for the first access technology (1120). The UE registers with a first PLMN of the one or more PLMNs that satisfy the network selection criteria (1130). The UE sets a condition for a subsequent network selection after the registering with the first PLMN (1140).