UE Non-Linearity Capability Feedback for Downlink Power Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Wireless communications systems face challenges in managing non-linearity in signal transmission, leading to increased power consumption and reduced signal-to-noise ratio, particularly in higher modulation orders.

Innovation Solution

User equipment (UE) reports its non-linearity reduction capability to the network entity through an extended channel state feedback (CSF) message, indicating a threshold for reducing signal non-linearity while maintaining link quality, allowing the network entity to adjust power amplifier supply voltage accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If higher modulation orders are used to increase data transmission rate, then productivity is improved, but non-linearity in signal transmission increases causing power consumption to increase and signal-to-noise ratio to deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transmission rateVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The UE measures the actual non-linearity of received downlink signals and feeds back this information to the network entity via uplink signaling. The network entity uses this feedback to adjust its power amplifier operation, creating a closed-loop system that optimizes power consumption while maintaining transmission quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The network entity dynamically adjusts power amplifier supply voltage based on the reported non-linearity threshold parameter. By changing the operating parameters of the power amplifier according to actual channel conditions and UE capability, the system achieves optimal trade-off between power consumption and signal quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If higher modulation orders are used to increase data transmission rate, then productivity is improved, but signal-to-noise ratio deteriorates due to increased non-linearity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transmission rateVSAvoidsignal-to-noise ratio
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The UE measures the actual non-linearity of received downlink signals and feeds back this information to the network entity via uplink signaling. The network entity uses this feedback to adjust its power amplifier operation, creating a closed-loop system that optimizes power consumption while maintaining transmission quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The network entity adjusts power amplifier operation in advance based on the reported non-linearity threshold before actual data transmission occurs. This preliminary adjustment ensures that the transmission parameters are optimized for the current channel conditions, preventing SNR deterioration before it occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If power amplifier supply voltage is increased to reduce non-linearity, then signal quality is improved, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal qualityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The network entity dynamically adjusts power amplifier supply voltage based on the reported non-linearity threshold parameter. By changing the operating parameters of the power amplifier according to actual channel conditions and UE capability, the system achieves optimal trade-off between power consumption and signal quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static power amplifier operation to dynamic adjustment based on real-time feedback. The power amplifier supply voltage is continuously adapted according to changing channel conditions and UE non-linearity cancellation capability, enabling the system to maintain signal quality while minimizing power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Reliability

If non-linearity cancellation capability is enhanced at the UE, then signal quality is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal qualityVSAvoidUE processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The UE autonomously measures the non-linearity of received signals, determines its own cancellation capability, and reports this information to the network entity. The UE also performs non-linearity cancellation processing on received signals using its own resources, reducing the burden on the network entity and enabling the system to function without additional external assistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12520183B2Report message for indicating non-linearity cancelation capability
Publication Date: 2026.01.06 QUALCOMM INC
  • US12520183B2 patent drawing
  • US12520183B2 patent drawing
  • US12520183B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and devices are described that support a report message for indicating non-linearity cancelation capability. A user equipment (UE) may receive one or more references signals from a network entity, where the reference signals are associated with a downlink resource allocation. The UE may measure a link quality metric for the reference signals. The UE may transmit a report message that includes at least a parameter indicating a non-linearity threshold associated with a capability of the UE to process non-linearity of downlink signals, where the parameter is based on the link quality metric and one or more characteristics of the downlink resource allocation. The network entity may receive the report message and transmit one or more downlink messages in accordance with the downlink resource allocation and based on the parameter.