UE Positioning Method Selection for Dynamic Wireless Networks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current positioning methods in wireless networks face challenges in dynamic environments, such as quick changes in satellite shadowing and small UE movements, leading to reduced accuracy and increased latency in location determination.

Innovation Solution

The UE is configured to select the most suitable positioning method from a plurality of available methods based on location context and criteria, such as accuracy and energy consumption, and communicates this selection to the location server, allowing for improved latency and reduced signaling in location information retrieval.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the location server specifies the positioning method, then the server has full control over positioning methodology, but the positioning accuracy decreases in dynamic environments due to inability to adapt to quick changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning accuracyVSAvoidadaptability to dynamic environment
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the traditional control relationship by allowing the UE (user equipment) to select the positioning method instead of the location server. The UE evaluates multiple positioning methods based on current environmental conditions and selects the most suitable one, then reports the selected method and location information to the server. This inversion enables adaptive positioning in dynamic environments while maintaining server control over the overall process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic selection of positioning methods based on changing environmental conditions. The UE continuously evaluates the suitability of different positioning methods (such as GNSS, OTDOA, ECID) according to current conditions like satellite visibility, signal quality, and movement status, allowing the system to adapt dynamically rather than using a static server-specified method.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If multiple positioning methods are evaluated and selected dynamically, then positioning accuracy improves in changing environments, but signaling overhead and latency increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning accuracyVSAvoidpositioning latency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by having the UE pre-evaluate multiple positioning methods and identify the most suitable one before actually performing positioning. The UE assesses the availability and suitability of different methods based on current conditions, selects the optimal method in advance, and then proceeds with positioning using that method, reducing actual positioning latency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The UE performs self-service by autonomously evaluating positioning methods, selecting the most suitable one, and determining its own location without requiring the server to specify the method. This self-service approach reduces signaling overhead and latency compared to server-controlled method selection, while the server retains oversight by receiving the selected method information and location results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If the UE autonomously selects positioning methods, then positioning performance improves through adaptive selection, but the complexity of the positioning system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning performanceVSAvoidpositioning system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses an intermediary approach where the UE acts as the selector of positioning methods based on pre-defined evaluation criteria. The UE evaluates methods according to established parameters (such as signal quality, availability, and suitability for current conditions) and selects accordingly, reducing the need for complex real-time decision-making algorithms while improving positioning performance through adaptive selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20240236915A9Method for generating location information in a wireless network
Publication Date: 2024.07.11 SONY GROUP CORP
  • US20240236915A9 patent drawing
  • US20240236915A9 patent drawing
  • US20240236915A9 patent drawing

AI summary

A method carried out in a user equipment, UE, (1) for generating location information to a location server (130) in a wireless network (100), the method comprising: receiving (404), from the location server, a location request message identifying a request for location information based on a UE-determined positioning method; obtaining (410) location information using a positioning method selected by the UE out of a plurality of available positioning methods, based on the location request message; transmitting (412) the location information to the location server.