UE Processing Time for Repeated DCI PDSCH HARQ-ACK Timing
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing wireless communication systems face challenges in determining the processing time for physical downlink shared channels (PDSCH) scheduled using downlink control information (DCI) repetition, which affects the transmission of hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ-ACK) feedback.
Innovation Solution
The user equipment (UE) receives multiple DCI repetitions associated with different PDCCH candidates and determines an additional processing time based on parameters related to these candidates to transmit HARQ-ACK feedback on the PUCCH, considering factors such as PDCCH and PDSCH overlap and UE processing capabilities.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If DCI repetition is used to schedule PDSCH, then reliability of downlink control information is improved, but processing time determination for HARQ-ACK feedback becomes more complex
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies preliminary action by pre-configuring multiple parameters (K1, K2, K3 values) and processing time determination rules before the actual communication occurs. The UE is provided with a set of predefined processing time values and selection criteria based on PDCCH candidate properties, search space set configurations, and CORESET parameters. This allows the UE to determine the correct processing time by referencing pre-established tables and rules rather than calculating it in real-time, thereby reducing the complexity of processing time determination while maintaining the reliability benefits of DCI repetition.
2Reliability
If multiple PDCCH candidates are used for DCI repetition, then robustness of scheduling information is improved, but UE processing time for HARQ-ACK feedback increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies parameter changes by dynamically selecting processing time values based on changing conditions related to PDCCH candidates. The UE determines which processing time parameter to use by evaluating properties of the PDCCH candidates (such as their association with different search space sets, CORESET configurations, and temporal relationships). This allows the system to adjust the processing time parameter according to the specific characteristics of the repeated DCI scheduling information, thereby maintaining robustness while optimizing the processing time for HARQ-ACK feedback.
3Measurement precision
If processing time is extended to accommodate DCI repetition, then accuracy of HARQ-ACK feedback timing is improved, but system throughput decreases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies dynamics by making the processing time determination adaptive rather than fixed. The UE dynamically selects the appropriate processing time value based on the specific properties of the PDCCH candidates and their associated DCI repetitions. This dynamic approach allows the system to extend processing time only when necessary (e.g., when PDCCH candidates are associated with different search space sets or have specific temporal relationships), while using shorter processing times when the conditions allow, thereby maintaining accuracy when needed while preserving throughput otherwise.
Data Source
AI summary
Various aspects of the present disclosure generally relate to wireless communication. In some aspects, a user equipment (UE) may receive a first downlink control information (DCI) repetition, for scheduling a physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH), wherein the first DCI repetition is associated with a first physical downlink control channel (PDCCH) candidate. The UE may receive a second DCI repetition associated with a second PDCCH candidate that is linked to the first PDCCH candidate for DCI repetition. The UE may transmit a feedback associated with a first symbol of a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) based at least in part on determining a processing time and an additional processing time, wherein determining the additional processing time comprises determining the additional processing time based at least in part on a parameter associated with at least one of the first PDCCH candidate or the second PDCCH candidate. Numerous other aspects are described.


