UE Processing Time Alignment in Non-Terrestrial Networks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In non-terrestrial network communications, user equipment (UE) faces challenges in processing times due to differences in scheduling offsets and timing advance values compared to terrestrial networks, leading to potential communication disruptions and energy inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

The UE obtains a first value associated with transmitting an uplink communication based on a downlink communication received in a non-terrestrial network and compares it to a second value, selectively transmitting or processing the communication based on the comparison to ensure alignment with terrestrial processing times, thereby improving communication reliability and energy efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the UE uses standard terrestrial network processing times for NTN communications, then the communication process is simple, but the processing time requirements are not met leading to communication disruptions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoidprocessing time management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The UE performs preliminary calculations to determine the actual processing time available for NTN communications by comparing the scheduling offset against a threshold value that accounts for NTN-specific timing characteristics. This preliminary assessment allows the UE to proactively adjust its processing approach before actual communication occurs, ensuring reliability without requiring complex real-time adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The UE dynamically adjusts its processing time management by selectively applying different processing approaches based on the calculated timing relationship. When the scheduling offset exceeds the threshold, the UE uses extended processing time; otherwise, it uses standard processing time. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction by making the system flexible rather than fixed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If the UE extends processing time to meet NTN requirements, then communication reliability improves, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoidUE energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The UE applies extended processing time only partially - specifically when the scheduling offset exceeds the NTN-specific threshold. In cases where the offset is sufficient, the UE uses standard processing time, avoiding unnecessary energy consumption. This partial application of the extended processing approach maintains reliability when needed while minimizing energy waste when not required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The UE changes the processing time parameter dynamically based on the scheduling offset value. By comparing the offset against the threshold and adjusting the processing time accordingly, the system optimizes the balance between reliability and energy consumption, using more processing time only when the communication parameters warrant it.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the UE uses NTN-specific processing times, then processing time requirements are met, but compatibility with terrestrial network standards decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing time requirement complianceVSAvoidnetwork compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The UE dynamically selects between terrestrial and NTN-specific processing times based on the scheduling offset comparison. This dynamic switching mechanism allows the UE to adapt to NTN requirements when necessary while maintaining compatibility with terrestrial standards when the offset allows, thus resolving the contradiction between requirement compliance and network compatibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The scheduling offset threshold comparison acts as an intermediary mechanism that determines which processing time standard to apply. This intermediary assessment layer allows the UE to bridge between terrestrial and NTN requirements, selecting the appropriate processing approach based on actual communication conditions rather than being locked into a single standard.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20240121738A1Non-terrestrial network communications
Publication Date: 2024.04.11 QUALCOMM INC
  • US20240121738A1 patent drawing
  • US20240121738A1 patent drawing
  • US20240121738A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various aspects of the present disclosure generally relate to wireless communication. In some aspects, a user equipment (UE) may obtain a first value associated with transmitting an uplink communication that corresponds to a downlink communication received in a non-terrestrial network (NTN). The UE may compare the first value to a second value. The UE may selectively transmit the uplink communication, or selectively process the downlink communication, based at least in part on a result of comparing the first value to the second value. Numerous other aspects are described.