Two-Stage UE Scheduling for Base Station Throughput

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In packet-based mobile communication systems, existing scheduling algorithms fail to efficiently allocate radio resources among user equipments (UEs) with different levels, leading to reduced overall throughput as UEs with high maximum throughput miss scheduling opportunities and compete unfairly, especially when channel conditions are acceptable.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that perform proportional fair scheduling by determining first and second maximum throughputs for UEs based on channel quality information and UE levels, with a two-stage sorting process to allocate resources, considering both channel conditions and capabilities, thereby optimizing resource allocation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If proportional fair scheduling is performed based solely on channel quality information, then scheduling simplicity is maintained, but UEs with high maximum throughput may miss scheduling opportunities and overall throughput decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverall throughputVSAvoidscheduling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the sorting process into two distinct stages: first-stage sorting based on maximum throughput and average throughput ratios, and second-stage sorting for UEs with the same level. This segmentation allows the system to consider UE capabilities without significantly increasing overall scheduling complexity, as each stage has a specific focus and criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different sorting criteria to different groups of UEs based on their characteristics. UEs with the same level undergo second-stage sorting based on channel quality information, while UEs with different levels are primarily sorted by their throughput ratios. This local differentiation ensures that each UE group is scheduled appropriately according to its specific properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If resources are allocated based on maximum throughput without considering UE levels, then high-capability UEs can achieve high data rates, but unfair competition occurs and overall system efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem efficiencyVSAvoidscheduling fairness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the scheduling parameter from considering only channel quality to considering both channel quality and UE level capabilities. By determining maximum throughput based on both channel quality information and UE levels, the system ensures that high-capability UEs can achieve high data rates while maintaining fair competition through the proportional fair scheduling mechanism that accounts for historical throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If two-stage sorting is performed to consider both throughput ratios and channel quality, then resource allocation fairness is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveallocation fairnessVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the sorting process into two distinct stages: first-stage sorting based on maximum throughput and average throughput ratios, and second-stage sorting for UEs with the same level. This segmentation allows the system to consider UE capabilities without significantly increasing overall scheduling complexity, as each stage has a specific focus and criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies the second-stage sorting only to UEs that have the same level and are adjacent in the first-stage sorted list. This partial application of the more complex sorting criterion reduces the overall computational burden compared to applying it to all UEs, while still achieving improved fairness where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9872300B2Method and apparatus for scheduling user equipments based on levels thereof in mobile communication system
Publication Date: 2018.01.16 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US9872300B2 patent drawing
  • US9872300B2 patent drawing
  • US9872300B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided are a method and apparatus for scheduling user equipments. The apparatus for allocating resources to UEs may include: a communication unit to send and receive data to and from one or more UEs; and a control unit to perform a process of determining the first maximum throughput based on channel quality information received from one or more UEs and UE levels, performing a first-stage sorting operation on a list of UEs based on the first maximum throughput and average throughput, performing, when there are two or more UEs that have the same UE level and are adjacent in the list, a second-stage sorting operation on those UEs based on the channel quality information, and allocating resources to at least one UE in the list. Accordingly, when UEs having different UE levels compete for resources, it is possible to increase the overall throughput of the base station.