UE TCI State Selection for Multi-TRP Beam Ambiguity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In wireless communications, the ambiguity in determining default transmit beams for user equipment (UE) due to varying beam switching timing thresholds across different transmission schemes and scheduling methods complicates efficient signal transmission between UEs and transmission reception points (TRPs).

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a method where UEs prioritize transmission schemes based on quasi-co-located (QCL) rules to select appropriate transmission configuration indication (TCI) states, allowing them to determine and indicate preferred transmission schemes for default beams, thereby resolving beam ambiguity by using QCL assumptions for single-TRP or multi-TRP schemes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If beam switching timing threshold changes depending on transmission scheme, then system adaptability improves, but beam determination ambiguity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem adaptabilityVSAvoidbeam determination ambiguity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by having the UE indicate its preferred transmission scheme to the TRP in advance. This allows the TRP to determine the beam switching timing threshold based on the pre-indicated scheme, resolving the ambiguity of which threshold to apply before actual beam switching occurs. The UE's indication of preferred scheme (single-TRP or multi-TRP) enables the system to pre-establish the appropriate timing threshold and default QCL rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback through the UE's indication of its preferred transmission scheme to the TRP. This feedback mechanism allows the TRP to adapt its beam switching behavior and threshold selection based on the UE's capabilities and preferences. The TRP uses this feedback information to determine the appropriate beam switching timing threshold and default QCL assumptions, eliminating the ambiguity that would exist without such feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple transmission schemes are supported, then system versatility improves, but complexity of beam selection increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem versatilityVSAvoidcomplexity of beam selection
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent reduces complexity through preliminary action by having the UE indicate its preferred transmission scheme in advance. This pre-indication allows both the UE and TRP to determine the appropriate beam selection rules and timing thresholds before actual transmission occurs, avoiding the need to evaluate multiple schemes at the moment of beam switching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by enabling different beam selection behaviors for different transmission schemes. The UE and TRP can apply specific default QCL rules and timing thresholds appropriate to each scheme (single-TRP or multi-TRP) based on the indicated preference, rather than using a single complex set of rules for all scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Loss of time

If default QCL rules are used for beam selection, then beam determination speed improves, but transmission reliability may decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam determination speedVSAvoidtransmission reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves the contradiction between speed and reliability through preliminary action. The UE indicates its preferred transmission scheme in advance, allowing the default QCL rules and beam switching timing threshold to be determined beforehand. This pre-determination maintains the speed advantage of using default rules while improving reliability by ensuring the correct scheme-specific rules are applied from the start.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The feedback mechanism of UE preference indication ensures that the appropriate default QCL rules are selected based on the actual transmission scheme preference. This feedback-driven selection maintains beam determination speed by using default rules while improving reliability by matching the rules to the correct transmission scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12069613B2Transmit beam selection schemes for multiple transmission reception points
Publication Date: 2024.08.20 QUALCOMM INC
  • US12069613B2 patent drawing
  • US12069613B2 patent drawing
  • US12069613B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and devices for wireless communications are described. A user equipment (UE) may prioritize a transmission scheme for a transmission configuration indication (TCI) state for receiving a downlink message from one or more transmission reception points (TRPs). The UE may receive a downlink control message via a first carrier that schedules a downlink signal for the UE via a second carrier. The UE may select one or more TCI states for reception of the downlink signal based at least in part on the prioritization of the first transmission scheme. The UE may receive the downlink signal via the second carrier in accordance with the selected one or more TCI states.