UI Element Identification via Visual Signatures

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Software testing tools face challenges in reliably identifying user interface elements after application updates, as changes in element attributes render existing locators ineffective, leading to failed tests and the need for rewritten test scripts.

Innovation Solution

Generating a signature for user interface elements that includes descriptive attributes, allowing for comparison with candidate elements in updated applications to determine matching elements, enabling continued testing operations without updating test scripts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional locators specifying element attributes are used to identify user interface elements, then test scripts can locate elements in the initial application, but the locators become ineffective after application updates that change element attributes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelement identification reliabilityVSAvoidlocator adaptability to updates
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the element identification approach by changing from attribute-based locators to visual feature-based signatures. Instead of relying on mutable attributes like IDs or classes that change during updates, the system extracts stable visual parameters (colors, shapes, positions, text content) that remain consistent across application updates, thereby maintaining identification reliability while adapting to changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a visual copy or representation of the user interface element through its signature - a set of visual characteristics that replicate the element's appearance and properties. This visual copy serves as a stable identifier that can be matched against updated elements without requiring the original attribute-based locator, enabling the test script to find the corresponding element even after updates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Productivity

If application updates are performed to improve functionality, then new features and fixes are deployed, but existing test scripts fail due to changed element attributes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication update frequencyVSAvoidtest script validity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary extraction of visual signatures for all test elements before application updates occur. These signatures are stored and used as the basis for element identification after updates. By preparing the visual fingerprint in advance, the system ensures that test scripts can automatically locate elements post-update without requiring manual script rewriting, thus maintaining test validity while enabling frequent updates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the visual signature extraction and matching process provides information about element correspondence between updated and original applications. This feedback allows the testing system to automatically adapt to updates by identifying matched elements through signature comparison, rather than relying on brittle attribute-based locators that break with updates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of manufacture

If attribute-based locators are used for element identification, then test scripts are simple to write initially, but extensive reconfiguration is needed after updates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetest script creation easeVSAvoidtest script maintenance ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical attribute-matching system with a visual signature recognition system. Instead of manually configuring locators based on element attributes and maintaining them through updates, the system automatically extracts visual signatures and performs matching. This substitution maintains the simplicity of initial test script creation while dramatically easing maintenance, as the visual matching process automatically adapts to updates without manual reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20200242017A1Identifying user interface elements using element signatures
Publication Date: 2020.07.30 SOFTESIS INC
  • US20200242017A1 patent drawing
  • US20200242017A1 patent drawing
  • US20200242017A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for performing automated software testing on user interface elements are disclosed. For instance, a first element of an application can be identified. A signature can be generated for the first element. The signature for the first element can include one or more attributes descriptive of the first element. After an update of the application, a candidate element signature can be generated for one or more candidate elements in the updated application. The signature for the first element can be compared to each candidate element signature to determine whether the first element matches each candidate element, thereby enabling the first element to be located after the update of the application.