UI Threat Detection Using Triggered Screenshot Screening

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Computing devices with modest resources face challenges in detecting computing threats efficiently due to the need for large and complex models, which consume significant computing resources and bandwidth, and there is a need to conserve resources, especially in battery-powered devices.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a rules-based approach to generate screenshots of potentially critical display content, encoding the content, and transmitting or analyzing it remotely to minimize resource usage, using application-specific rules to reduce the number of screenshots generated, transmitted, and analyzed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If large and complex models are used for threat detection, then detection accuracy is improved, but processor loading and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreat detection accuracyVSAvoidprocessor loading and energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the threat detection task into two segments: a lightweight on-device model that performs initial screening of screenshots, and a larger remote model that provides comprehensive analysis for flagged cases. This segmentation allows the device to maintain low energy consumption while still achieving high detection accuracy through the remote model's capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary threat assessment using a lightweight local model before engaging the more resource-intensive remote analysis. This preliminary action filters out benign cases, ensuring that the larger remote model only processes potentially threatening screenshots, thereby reducing overall energy consumption while maintaining detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If continuous monitoring and screenshot capture are performed, then threat detection capability is improved, but bandwidth consumption and data storage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreat detection capabilityVSAvoidbandwidth consumption and data storage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of analyzing every screenshot captured, the system applies partial action by using the lightweight local model to selectively identify only those screenshots that warrant further analysis. This approach maintains strong threat detection capability while significantly reducing bandwidth consumption and data storage requirements by transmitting only a subset of screenshots to the remote system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The lightweight local model acts as an intermediary that filters screenshots before they are transmitted remotely. This intermediary layer prevents unnecessary data transmission and storage by identifying and blocking benign screenshots, thereby reducing bandwidth consumption and data storage requirements while maintaining effective threat detection through the remote model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If comprehensive user interface monitoring is implemented, then security coverage is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity coverageVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring system is segmented into multiple layers: a comprehensive but lightweight local monitoring component that captures all UI events, and a more specialized remote analysis system that handles deep inspection. This segmentation allows the device to maintain comprehensive security coverage without overburdening the local system with complex analysis algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The local lightweight model serves as an intermediary between the comprehensive UI monitoring system and the remote analysis system. It processes the monitored data locally with minimal complexity, filtering and preparing only necessary information for remote transmission, thereby reducing the overall system complexity while maintaining comprehensive security coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20260075081A1System and method for detection and mitigation of computing threats
Publication Date: 2026.03.12 GEN DIGITAL INC
  • US20260075081A1 patent drawing
  • US20260075081A1 patent drawing
  • US20260075081A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system enables a method for detecting and mitigating a computing threat. The method includes monitoring, by a computing device, a user interface of the computing device. The computing device encodes an output of the user interface to generate a text encoding. The computing device analyzes the text encoding to detect one or more triggers and performs a screen capture of the user interface to generate a screenshot responsive to the detecting the one or more triggers. The computing device transmits the screenshot via a network. The computing device receives via the network an indication based on the screenshot and controls a function of the computing device based on the indication based on the screenshot.