Network Watermark Authentication With Trusted UID Lists

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing network security technologies, such as digital and hardware watermarks, are inadequate in preventing attacks like Sybil, Stolen Identity, Invisible Node, Rush, Blackhole, and Jellyfish in MANet and ad-hoc networks, compromising information integrity.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a network watermark process that creates a verifiable communications path through a network of nodes by verifying unique identifiers (UIDs) and class identifiers, ensuring secure communication paths and validating nodes against trusted lists and application-specific criteria.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If digital and hardware watermarks are used for network security, then authentication capability is improved, but security against Sybil, Stolen Identity, Invisible Node, Rush, Blackhole, and Jellyfish attacks is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication capabilityVSAvoidvulnerability to network attacks
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The network path is segmented into multiple hops with each node verifying the previous node's UID against a trusted list. This segmentation allows distributed verification of authenticity at each hop, preventing attacks like Sybil and Stolen Identity where a single point of failure would be insufficient. Each node independently validates the chain of trust, making the system more resilient to compromise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Trusted lists of UIDs are pre-established and distributed to nodes before the actual communication occurs. This preliminary action enables nodes to verify the authenticity of communicating parties in advance, preventing impersonation attacks before they can compromise the network. The verification process is performed proactively rather than reactively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If network path verification is implemented through multiple nodes, then security against impersonation attacks is improved, but communication overhead and processing complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity against impersonation attacksVSAvoidverification process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Each node performs self-verification by checking the previous node's UID against its locally stored trusted list without requiring external intervention. The verification process is autonomous and distributed, with each node independently validating the chain of trust using its own resources. This eliminates the need for a central authority to manage verification complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the verification parameter from complex cryptographic proofs to simple UID list comparisons. Instead of requiring complex authentication protocols at each hop, nodes simply compare UIDs against pre-shared trusted lists, significantly reducing the computational complexity while maintaining security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of information

If UID verification against trusted lists is performed at each node, then information integrity is improved, but processing time and communication delay increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation integrityVSAvoidverification time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Trusted lists of UIDs are pre-distributed to nodes before communication begins, eliminating the need for time-consuming list exchanges during actual data transmission. This preliminary action ensures that verification can proceed rapidly using locally cached data, reducing latency while maintaining integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of verifying through complex cryptographic operations, the system uses simplified UID comparisons against copied trusted lists. This approach trades some verification thoroughness for speed by using lightweight comparisons rather than heavy cryptographic computations, achieving a balance between integrity and performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS20250280038A1Network watermark
Publication Date: 2025.09.04 CODE-X DELAWARE INC
  • US20250280038A1 patent drawing
  • US20250280038A1 patent drawing
  • US20250280038A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A network communications method utilizing a network watermark for providing security in the communications includes creating a verifiable network communications path of nodes through a network for the transfer of information from a first end node to a second end node; verifying the network communications path of nodes, by the first end node, before communicating by the first end node information intended for receipt by the second end node; and once the network communications path of nodes is verified by the first end node, communicating by the first end node, via the verified communications path of nodes, the information intended for receipt by the second end node; wherein the network watermark represents the verifiable network communications path of nodes.