ULP Wireless Receiver Dynamic Gain Control for Packet Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Ultra-low-power (ULP) wireless receivers face challenges in detecting intended packets due to direct current offset (DCO) issues and the need for reliable energy detection and automatic gain control, especially in environments with coexisting wireless local area network (WLAN), Bluetooth (BT), and Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) devices in the 2.4 GHz ISM band.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for a sliding intermediate frequency (SIF) non-coherent (NC) ULP wireless receiver that dynamically adjusts gain, compensates for unknown offset voltage values, and employs energy detection and packet detection techniques using autocorrelation values to reliably distinguish intended IEEE 802.15.4q physical layer packets from other packets.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If high gains are used in baseband stages to amplify weak signals, then signal detection capability is improved, but direct current offset (DCO) is significantly amplified causing detection errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal detection capabilityVSAvoiddetection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary energy detection and DCO estimation during a noise period before the actual signal arrives. This preliminary action allows the system to establish baseline characteristics and compensate for DCO effects before high-gain amplification of the weak signal, preventing DCO from causing detection errors while maintaining signal detection capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors the received signal and uses feedback mechanisms to dynamically adjust gain control and DCO compensation parameters. The feedback loop compares detected energy levels against thresholds and refines DCO estimates, allowing the system to maintain high gain for weak signals while compensating for DCO-induced detection errors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Device complexity

If fixed total gain is used in the receiver, then device complexity is reduced, but saturation effects or low signal-to-noise ratio occur leading to improper signal demodulation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereceiver structureVSAvoidsignal demodulation quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic gain control that automatically adjusts the total gain based on the detected signal energy level. During noise periods, the gain is set to one value, while during signal periods, the gain is dynamically adjusted to prevent saturation and maintain optimal signal-to-noise ratio. This dynamic adaptation ensures proper signal demodulation without requiring complex manual configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Use of energy by moving object

If simple energy detection is used to detect packet arrival, then power consumption is reduced, but false detection between noise and signal periods increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidpacket detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary energy detection during a noise period before the actual packet arrives. This preliminary detection establishes a baseline noise level and allows the system to set appropriate thresholds for subsequent signal detection. By comparing detected energy against this baseline and using DCO-compensated autocorrelation, the system reduces false detections while maintaining low power consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces simple threshold-based energy detection with a more sophisticated detection mechanism that uses DCO-compensated autocorrelation analysis. This substitution maintains low power consumption by using efficient digital signal processing while significantly improving detection accuracy by eliminating the ambiguity between noise and signal periods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If DCO compensation is performed continuously, then detection accuracy is improved, but power consumption and processing complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs DCO compensation periodically rather than continuously. Specifically, DCO estimation and compensation are performed during noise periods and at the beginning of signal periods, then the compensated parameters are held constant throughout the packet reception. This periodic approach maintains detection accuracy while significantly reducing power consumption and processing complexity compared to continuous compensation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS10904156B2Method and apparatus for detecting packet
Publication Date: 2021.01.26 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US10904156B2 patent drawing
  • US10904156B2 patent drawing
  • US10904156B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method to detect a packet includes: receiving an input sequence including preambles; detecting a transition from a noise period to a signal period in the input sequence; dynamically adjusting a gain of the input sequence in response to the signal period being initiated; and distinguishing an intended packet from other packets, among packets received in the preambles.