Ultra-Low Power VCO With Dual Resonators and Transformer Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional voltage controlled oscillator (VCO) designs lack adjustable gate DC voltage, negative Miller capacitor, and transformer feedback, leading to suboptimal resonator quality and performance in ultra-low power applications such as wireless sensor nodes and energy harvesting systems.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a ultralow power VCO circuit design incorporating two-side resonators, negative Miller capacitors, transformer feedback, and sub-threshold gate biasing, along with near-triode drain biasing, to enhance inductor quality and achieve higher speed and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional VCO designs are used, then the circuit structure is simple, but the inductor quality is suboptimal and performance is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinductor qualityVSAvoidcircuit structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The VCO circuit is segmented into two separate resonators (first resonator connected to drain, second resonator connected to gate) instead of using a single resonator. This segmentation allows each resonator to be optimized independently, improving overall inductor quality while maintaining manageable circuit complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements nesting by placing the second resonator (gate-side resonator) within the feedback path of the first resonator (drain-side resonator) through transformer coupling. The transformer feedback mechanism creates a nested structure where the gate resonator is effectively nested within the drain resonator's oscillation cycle, enhancing inductor quality through mutual coupling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Use of energy by moving object

If sub-threshold design and near-triode design are implemented, then power consumption is reduced, but oscillation speed and frequency performance deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidoscillation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different biasing conditions to different parts of the circuit: sub-threshold biasing is applied to the gate terminal to minimize power consumption, while near-triode biasing is applied to the drain terminal to maintain high oscillation speed. This local differentiation of operating conditions allows simultaneous optimization of power efficiency and speed performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The circuit dynamically transitions between different operating regions by utilizing the transformer feedback mechanism to maintain near-triode conditions at the drain during oscillation while keeping the gate in sub-threshold region. This dynamic operation allows the circuit to achieve ultra-low power consumption without sacrificing oscillation speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If transformer feedback with one-side resonator is used, then circuit complexity is reduced, but resonator quality is not optimized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresonator qualityVSAvoidcircuit structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The single resonator is segmented into two separate resonators: a first resonator connected to the drain and a second resonator connected to the gate. This segmentation allows each resonator to be independently optimized for quality factor, with the first resonator handling the primary oscillation and the second resonator providing feedback through the transformer, thereby optimizing overall resonator quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A transformer is introduced as an intermediary element to couple the first resonator (drain-side) and the second resonator (gate-side). This transformer feedback mechanism acts as a mediator that transfers energy between the two resonators, optimizing the quality factor by allowing independent tuning of each resonator while maintaining strong coupling through the transformer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Speed

If negative Miller capacitor is added, then oscillation speed and frequency response are improved, but circuit complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoscillation speedVSAvoidcircuit structure
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The negative Miller capacitor is merged with the existing gate-side resonator (second resonator) structure. Instead of adding a completely separate component, the negative Miller capacitance is implemented by configuring the gate resonator's capacitive elements to provide the negative Miller effect, thereby improving oscillation speed while minimizing additional circuit complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The gate-side resonator (second resonator) serves multiple functions: it acts as the feedback resonator for oscillation, provides the negative Miller capacitance effect for speed enhancement, and contributes to the overall frequency determination. This multi-functionality reduces the need for additional dedicated components, limiting the increase in circuit complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design achieves improved inductor quality, higher speed, and enhanced performance in ultra-low power applications, as demonstrated by significant improvements in frequency of operation and phase noise reduction compared to existing benchmarks.

Implementation Method 1

the first resonator and the second resonator are coupled together through a transformer to provide feedback

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTransformer feedback: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

In addition, a first negative Miller capacitor and a second negative Miller capacitor are implemented

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMiller capacitor effect: Capacitance

Implementation Method 3

sub-threshold design on gate terminal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSub-threshold conduction:

Implementation Method 4

near-triode design on drain terminal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTriode region operation:

Data Source

PatentUS10236824B2Ultra-low power voltage controlled oscillator
Publication Date: 2019.03.19 TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD
  • US10236824B2 patent drawing
  • US10236824B2 patent drawing
  • US10236824B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A voltage controlled oscillator (“VCO”) circuit is disclosed. The VCO includes a switch module comprising a first transistor and a second transistor; a first LC-tank module, the first LC-tank module is operatively connected between the drain of the first transistor and the drain of the second transistor; and a second LC-tank module, the second LC-tank module is operatively connected between the gate of the first transistor and the gate of the second transistor, the source of the first transistor and the source of the second transistor are operatively connected.