Ultralight Aircraft Self-Testing for Weight-Based Airworthiness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Inexperienced pilots operating ultralight aircraft face challenges in conducting preflight checks due to the unique weight restrictions and safety considerations of these aircraft, which require new automated self-testing techniques to ensure airworthiness without additional equipment or sensors.

Innovation Solution

Implementing an automated self-testing process using existing aircraft equipment, such as rotor thrust analysis, to determine flight-time variables like payload-inclusive weight and center of gravity during flight, allowing for autonomous takeoff and landing decisions based on airworthiness thresholds, ensuring safe operation without manual pilot intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If inexperienced pilots perform manual preflight checks, then they can identify basic aircraft issues, but they lack the knowledge to perform comprehensive checks specific to ultralight aircraft weight restrictions and safety requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveairworthiness determinationVSAvoidpreflight check complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The aircraft performs self-testing of its own systems and components during flight operations. The flight control system automatically monitors weight, center of gravity, and system functionality, eliminating the need for pilot expertise in performing comprehensive preflight checks while ensuring reliable airworthiness determination

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs automated airworthiness checks before flight operations begin. Weight and center of gravity are calculated and validated in advance, and any issues are identified and addressed before the aircraft becomes operational, ensuring safety without requiring pilot knowledge

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If traditional preflight check procedures are used, then basic safety checks can be performed, but comprehensive airworthiness verification cannot be achieved due to pilot inexperience

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveairworthiness verificationVSAvoidtesting procedure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Manual mechanical preflight check procedures are replaced with an automated electronic flight control system that calculates weight, determines center of gravity, and validates airworthiness parameters automatically. This substitution maintains high reliability while eliminating procedure complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The flight control system continuously monitors aircraft parameters and provides feedback on airworthiness status. Weight sensors, center of gravity calculations, and system diagnostics feed information back to the pilot, automatically verifying comprehensive airworthiness without complex manual procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Extent of automation

If automated self-testing is implemented, then comprehensive airworthiness can be determined automatically, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveself-testing automationVSAvoidtesting system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The flight control system performs multiple functions including weight calculation, center of gravity determination, airworthiness verification, and flight control. By making the system universal and multi-functional, automation is achieved without adding separate dedicated testing equipment, thus avoiding increased device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The automated self-testing functions are merged with the existing flight control system rather than being implemented as separate equipment. Weight sensors, calculation algorithms, and verification procedures are integrated into the flight control architecture, achieving high automation while maintaining system simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Adaptability or versatility

If ultralight aircraft operate with weight restrictions, then they achieve ultralight classification and regulatory benefits, but the payload capacity is severely limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregulatory complianceVSAvoidpayload weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically calculates and adjusts payload limits based on real-time weight and center of gravity measurements. Rather than using fixed static limits, the aircraft adapts payload capacity dynamically according to actual loading conditions, enabling maximum compliant payload while maintaining regulatory compliance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The flight control system changes operational parameters such as maximum payload weight and center of gravity boundaries based on aircraft configuration, environmental conditions, and mission requirements. This allows the aircraft to optimize payload capacity while remaining within ultralight regulatory limits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11161623B2Automated self-testing
Publication Date: 2021.11.02 KITTY HAWK CORP
  • US11161623B2 patent drawing
  • US11161623B2 patent drawing
  • US11161623B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A flight-time variable associated with an aircraft is determined including by determining the flight-time variable while the aircraft is flying. It is determined whether the aircraft is airworthy based at least in part on the flight-time variable. In response to determining that the aircraft is not airworthy, the aircraft is automatically landed.