Ultrasonic Cleaning Resonator Interference Pattern

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional ultrasonic and megasonic cleaning methods for semiconductor substrates are inadequate in minimizing damage and ensuring uniform removal of nanoparticulate contaminants, often causing non-uniform cleaning patterns and structural damage.

Innovation Solution

A device that uses a resonator to generate an interference pattern in the liquid at the solid-liquid interface, combined with a gas-containing treatment fluid that creates tunable gas dispersion, allowing for optimized bubble activity and reduced substrate damage by operating below the cavitation threshold, thereby enhancing cleaning uniformity and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional ultrasonic or megasonic cleaning methods are used to remove nanoparticulate contaminants, then particle removal is achieved, but substrate damage occurs and cleaning uniformity is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle removal efficiencyVSAvoidsubstrate damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the physical parameters of the cleaning system by introducing gas bubbles of controlled size distribution and operating below the cavitation threshold. This transforms the cleaning mechanism from violent cavitation to gentler microstreaming and shear stress, achieving particle removal without substrate damage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Gas bubbles serve as intermediaries between the ultrasonic field and the substrate surface. The bubbles generate microstreaming and shear stress that act on contaminants, indirectly removing particles without direct contact between high-energy ultrasound and the substrate, thus preventing damage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If conventional ultrasonic or megasonic cleaning methods are used to remove nanoparticulate contaminants, then particle removal is achieved, but cleaning uniformity is poor with non-uniform patterns

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle removal efficiencyVSAvoidcleaning uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates local variations in bubble size distribution and concentration across the substrate surface, with different regions having optimized bubble characteristics. This local quality control ensures uniform cleaning action across the entire substrate, preventing non-uniform patterns while maintaining high particle removal efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If high power ultrasonic cleaning is used to maximize particle removal, then cleaning efficiency improves, but the operating window becomes restricted and damage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning efficiencyVSAvoidoperating window restriction
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically controls bubble generation and dissolution by adjusting gas flow rates and ultrasonic power in real-time. This dynamic control allows the system to operate below the cavitation threshold while maintaining effective cleaning, expanding the operating window and enabling efficient cleaning without restricting operational flexibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution improves cleaning uniformity, increases process time efficiency, and expands the operating window for particle removal while reducing substrate damage, compared to conventional techniques which often associate high particle removal with significant damage.

Implementation Method 1

The resonator is moreover configured to introduce an interference pattern in the liquid and consequently distinct regions of pressure amplitude minima and maxima are generated at the solid-liquid interface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInterference: Interference

Implementation Method 2

a gas-containing fluid that generates a gas dispersion in the treatment fluid when the pressure is reduced

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure reduction induced gas dispersion: Depressurisation

Implementation Method 3

Acoustically activated bubbles close to any liquid-surface interface causes (a) shear stress at the surface, which can lead to the removal of particulate contaminants from the surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic cavitation: Acoustic Cavitation

Implementation Method 4

microstreaming, which can lead to the enhancement of diffusion limited reactions beneficial for electrochemical deposition processes, etching, rinsing and mixing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMicrostreaming:

Data Source

PatentUS9662686B2Ultrasonic cleaning method and apparatus
Publication Date: 2017.05.30 LAM RES AG
  • US9662686B2 patent drawing
  • US9662686B2 patent drawing
  • US9662686B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device and method for treating the surface of a semiconductor wafer provides a treatment fluid in the form of a dispersion of gas bubbles in a treatment liquid generated at acoustic pressures less than those required to induce cavitation in the treatment liquid. A resonator supplies ultrasonic or megasonic energy to the treatment fluid and is configured to create an interference pattern in the treatment fluid comprising regions of pressure amplitude minima and maxima at an interface of the treatment fluid and the semiconductor wafer.