Ultrasonic Extraction Performance Checking Device

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional ultrasonic extractors face issues with non-uniform sound field intensity, positional variability in sample extraction, and potential for false negative results due to inadequate cavitation detection methods, which affect extraction efficiency and accuracy.

Innovation Solution

An ultrasonic extraction performance checking device using a specially formulated alloy foil with a tensioning fixture, placed within the ultrasonic extractor, undergoes cavitation corrosion to assess sound field coverage and intensity, allowing for visual evaluation of extraction efficiency and uniformity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional ultrasonic extractors are used, then extraction can be performed, but the sound field intensity is not uniform and positional variability in sample extraction occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveextraction uniformityVSAvoidposition-dependent extraction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by using multiple ultrasonic vibrators distributed at different positions and orientations within the extraction chamber. Each vibrator creates a localized strong sound field in its vicinity, ensuring that samples regardless of position are exposed to adequate ultrasonic intensity for consistent extraction performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The ultrasonic extraction system is segmented into multiple independent vibrators rather than using a single source. This segmentation allows the sound field to be distributed more uniformly throughout the extraction space, eliminating positional variability and ensuring consistent extraction efficiency across different sample locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If existing cavitation detection methods are used, then cavitation can be detected, but the methods are complex and may produce false negative results

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary aluminum foil that serves as a visual indicator for cavitation detection. The foil is placed at the bottom of the extraction chamber and undergoes characteristic changes when exposed to ultrasonic cavitation, providing a simple and reliable visual method to confirm adequate cavitation without complex instrumentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex mechanical or electronic cavitation detection systems with a simple visual observation method using aluminum foil. This substitution maintains detection reliability while dramatically reducing system complexity and eliminating the risk of false negative results associated with sophisticated instruments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If ultrasonic extraction is performed without performance checking, then extraction can proceed, but extraction completeness cannot be ensured leading to false negative results

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveextraction speedVSAvoidextraction completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by placing the aluminum foil indicator at the bottom of the extraction chamber before starting the ultrasonic extraction process. This allows for pre-assessment of cavitation conditions and extraction completeness, ensuring that the extraction parameters are adequate before the actual extraction begins, thereby preventing false negative results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method provides a simple, visual, and efficient means to quantify ultrasonic extraction performance, ensuring consistent extraction across different positions and reducing the risk of false negatives, thereby improving operational efficiency and accuracy.

Implementation Method 1

undergoes cavitation corrosion to assess sound field coverage and intensity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCavitation: Cavitation

Implementation Method 2

The strength of the cavitation effect of ultrasonic extraction is related to the ultrasound frequency

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectUltrasonic cavitation: Acoustic Cavitation

Implementation Method 3

The tensioning fixture is used to tightly fix the alloy foil, and the alloy foil is flat

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS11408862B2Ultrasonic extraction performance checking device and method for ultrasonic extractor for detecting and analyzing chemical composition of consumer product
Publication Date: 2022.08.09 SHENZHEN TECH UNIV
  • US11408862B2 patent drawing
  • US11408862B2 patent drawing
  • US11408862B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An ultrasonic extraction performance checking device and method for an ultrasonic extractor for detecting and analyzing a chemical composition of a consumer product. The ultrasonic extraction performance checking device includes a hanging frame which is hung inside the ultrasonic extractor and matched with the ultrasonic extractor, and a hanging frame plane checking device which is detachably and vertically or horizontally placed in the hanging frame and clamped with an alloy foil. The alloy foil is surrounded by a tensioning fixture. The tensioning fixture causes the alloy foil to generate a surface tension of 5 to 15 N and to be tightened and fixed to the bottom surface of the hanging frame plane checking device.