Ultrasonic Hardness Verification for Ball Studs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for determining the hardness of components, such as ball studs, often require destructive testing, making it difficult to assess whether heat-treated components have the desired hardness, especially when case-hardened surfaces are present, and pose challenges during manufacturing and post-installation inspections.

Innovation Solution

A non-destructive ultrasonic meter system that emits a signal along the longitudinal axis of a component, measuring the signal's velocity to determine hardness, allowing for quick and accurate assessment without disassembly, even when case-hardened surfaces inhibit other measurement methods.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional hardness testing methods are used, then hardness measurement can be performed, but the component must be cut in half and destroyed in the process

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehardness measurement capabilityVSAvoidcomponent integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical indentation methods (Vickers/Brinell scales requiring physical cutting and indentation) with ultrasonic wave propagation. The ultrasonic meter sends acoustic waves through the component and measures hardness based on wave velocity, eliminating the need for mechanical destruction while maintaining measurement accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces ultrasonic waves as an intermediary medium to assess hardness. Instead of directly applying mechanical force to indent the surface, the ultrasonic waves serve as a non-contact intermediary that interacts with the material's elastic properties to infer hardness through velocity measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If case hardened outer surface is present, then surface hardness can be measured, but internal hardness becomes difficult to determine using conventional methods

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface hardness measurementVSAvoidinternal hardness detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from surface-level measurement to internal volume measurement by sending ultrasonic waves through the entire component thickness. This dimensional penetration allows simultaneous assessment of both surface and internal hardness regions, overcoming the limitation of conventional surface-only methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Measurement precision

If destructive testing is performed to determine hardness, then accurate hardness data can be obtained, but the component becomes useless for further use

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehardness data accuracyVSAvoidcomponent usability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes destructive mechanical indentation with non-destructive ultrasonic wave propagation. The ultrasonic method obtains accurate hardness data through elastic wave velocity measurements while leaving the component intact and fully usable for its intended application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Measurement precision

If conventional hardness testing is performed on installed components, then hardness can be assessed, but disassembly is required which is inconvenient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehardness assessment capabilityVSAvoidcomponent accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces invasive disassembly-based testing with non-contact ultrasonic measurement. The ultrasonic meter can penetrate through the component surface and measure hardness through existing surfaces, eliminating the need for disassembly and enabling easy in-service inspection of installed components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables reliable, non-destructive hardness evaluation of components throughout the manufacturing process and after installation, effectively distinguishing between acceptable and defective parts with high accuracy, minimizing the need for replacement.

Implementation Method 1

A non-destructive ultrasonic meter system that emits a signal along the longitudinal axis of a component, measuring the signal's velocity to determine hardness

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectUltrasonic vibration: Ultrasonic Vibration

Implementation Method 2

reflecting the emitted signal, via an opposed second surface of the component to be tested, back toward a detector of the probe

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSound wave reflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS10036733B2Hardness verification utilizing ultrasonic velocities
Publication Date: 2018.07.31 ZF FRIEDRICHSHAFEN AG
  • US10036733B2 patent drawing
  • US10036733B2 patent drawing
  • US10036733B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system for determining a hardness of a component to be tested by utilizing an ultrasonic meter. The method and system both comprise selecting a component to be tested which has a longitudinal axis; positioning a probe of the ultrasonic meter for emitting a signal from an emitter of the probe into an end surface of the component to be tested and along the longitudinal axis of the component; emitting the signal from the emitter of the probe into the first surface of the component to be tested; passing the emitted signal through the component to be tested; reflecting the emitted signal via an opposed second surface of the component to be tested back toward a detector of the probe; detecting the reflected signal via the detector of the probe; and determining a hardness of the component to be tested based upon a velocity of the emitted signal.