Ultrasonic Horn Alignment Detection via Accelerometer Signal Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Ultrasonic welding systems face challenges in aligning the ultrasonic horn with the anvil, resulting in undesirable structural characteristics of weld joints.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing first and second accelerometer sensors on a bracket coupled to the anvil generates signals indicative of accelerations when the ultrasonic horn vibrates, with a microprocessor determining the difference in signal amplitudes to determine alignment, storing an identifier value if the difference is within a threshold, and providing feedback through a display and speaker.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional ultrasonic welding systems are used without alignment detection, then the system structure remains simple, but the alignment between ultrasonic horn and anvil becomes difficult to control, resulting in undesirable weld joint structural characteristics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual or mechanical alignment methods with an electronic sensing system. Accelerometer sensors detect vibrations transmitted through the bracket during ultrasonic operation, and a microprocessor analyzes these signals to determine alignment status, substituting mechanical alignment procedures with an electronic detection and analysis system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides real-time feedback about alignment status by processing vibration signals from the accelerometer sensors. The microprocessor analyzes the amplitude differences in signals from different sensor positions and provides information about whether the horn is properly aligned with the anvil, enabling operators to adjust alignment based on quantitative feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If alignment detection systems are implemented, then weld joint structural characteristics improve, but the device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweld joint qualityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses the existing ultrasonic vibration and the bracket structure already present in the welding system to perform alignment detection. The bracket serves dual purposes: structural support and vibration transmission path for the accelerometer sensors. This self-service approach leverages existing system components rather than requiring entirely separate alignment equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The accelerometer sensors act as intermediaries between the ultrasonic horn-anvil interface and the control system. They convert mechanical vibrations into electrical signals that can be processed by the microprocessor, providing an indirect but effective means of monitoring alignment without requiring direct measurement at the horn-anvil contact point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Manufacturing precision

If manual alignment methods are used, then the system remains simple to operate, but alignment precision deteriorates, resulting in inconsistent weld joints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment precisionVSAvoidoperational simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides real-time feedback about alignment status by processing vibration signals from the accelerometer sensors. The microprocessor analyzes the amplitude differences in signals from different sensor positions and provides information about whether the horn is properly aligned with the anvil, enabling operators to adjust alignment based on quantitative feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual or mechanical alignment methods with an electronic sensing system. Accelerometer sensors detect vibrations transmitted through the bracket during ultrasonic operation, and a microprocessor analyzes these signals to determine alignment status, substituting mechanical alignment procedures with an electronic detection and analysis system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Effectively determines the alignment of the ultrasonic horn with the anvil, ensuring consistent and desirable weld joint structural characteristics by providing real-time alignment feedback.

Implementation Method 1

when the ultrasonic horn is vibrating and contacting the anvil

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration: Vibration

Implementation Method 2

first and second accelerometer sensors are configured to generate first and second signals, respectively, indicative of first and second accelerations

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcceleration: Accelerometer

Data Source

PatentUS8433433B2System and method for determining whether an ultrasonic horn is aligned with an anvil
Publication Date: 2013.04.30 LG ENERGY SOLUTION LTD
  • US8433433B2 patent drawing
  • US8433433B2 patent drawing
  • US8433433B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and a method for determining whether an ultrasonic horn is aligned with an anvil of an ultrasonic welding system are provided. The first and second accelerometer sensors generate first and second signals indicative of first and second accelerations of first and second positions on a bracket coupled to the anvil when the ultrasonic horn is vibrating and contacting the anvil. The system further includes a microprocessor that receives the first and second signals. The microprocessor determines a difference between an amplitude of the first signal at a first time and an amplitude of the second signal at the first time. The microprocessor stores a first identifier value in a memory device indicating that the ultrasonic horn is aligned with the anvil if the difference between the amplitude of the first signal and the amplitude of the second signal is less than or equal to a threshold value.