Ultrasonic Weld Melt Layer Control for Consistent Joint Strength

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Ultrasonic welding of thermoplastics faces challenges in achieving consistent weld quality due to real-life variations in part dimensions and limited control over molten material displacement, leading to inconsistent weld strength and potential formation of 'cold welds' or excessive flash.

Innovation Solution

A method for optimizing ultrasonic welding process settings, particularly using a servo-controlled ultrasonic welding process, where weld process parameters such as weld velocity, dynamic hold velocity, and melt layer thickness are precisely controlled to ensure consistent melt layer formation, correlating melt layer thickness with weld strength, and adjusting these settings to achieve weld joints with predetermined strength equal to or greater than the parent material strength.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If time, energy, or weld distance control modes are used in ultrasonic welding, then the welding process is simple and easy to automate, but weld consistency cannot be assured due to variations in part dimensions and limited control over molten material displacement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of automationVSAvoidweld consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from conventional control parameters (time, energy, weld distance) to a new control parameter system based on melt layer thickness measurement and control. By measuring the actual melt layer thickness during welding and adjusting process parameters accordingly, the system achieves precise control over molten material displacement while maintaining ease of automation through computer-controlled parameter adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback control mechanism where the melt layer thickness is measured during the welding process, and this measurement is used to adjust subsequent welding parameters. The system continuously monitors the welding state and modifies process parameters in real-time to maintain consistent weld quality despite variations in part dimensions, resolving the contradiction between ease of operation and manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If conventional ultrasonic welding control is used, then the process is fast and economical, but it cannot assure consistent weld quality due to limited ability to control molten material displacement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewelding speedVSAvoidmolten material displacement control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces conventional mechanical/pneumatic control systems with a measurement-based control system. Instead of relying solely on mechanical displacement control or pneumatic pressure control, the system uses optical or other measurement techniques to directly measure melt layer thickness and uses this information to control the welding process, achieving superior control over molten material displacement while maintaining high welding speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic control of welding parameters based on real-time melt layer thickness measurements. Rather than using fixed pre-programmed parameters, the system continuously adapts welding parameters such as amplitude, frequency, and pressure based on the measured state of the melt layer, enabling precise control of molten material displacement during the dynamic welding process while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If weld process parameters are not precisely controlled, then the process is simple to operate, but cold welds or excessive flash may form

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess simplicityVSAvoidweld quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a self-adjusting welding system that automatically measures melt layer thickness and adjusts process parameters without requiring operator intervention. The system serves itself by continuously monitoring the welding state and making real-time parameter adjustments to prevent cold welds or excessive flash, maintaining both ease of operation (no complex operator skills needed) and high reliability (consistent weld quality).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for the production of high-strength weld joints with consistent quality by accurately controlling the melt layer thickness, reducing the need for destructive testing and improving the efficiency of the welding process.

Implementation Method 1

The ultrasonic welding process is fast, economical and easily automated

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectUltrasonic vibration: Ultrasonic Vibration

Implementation Method 2

The horn applies high frequency energy to the part

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction heating: Viscous Heating

Implementation Method 3

control the rate of molten material displacement

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting: Melting

Data Source

PatentEP3807080B1Methods for determining a melt layer thickness associated with a predetermined weld strength based on a correlation therebetween
Publication Date: 2025.03.26 DUKANE IAS LLC
  • EP3807080B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1C
  • EP3807080B1 patent drawingFigure 2A
  • EP3807080B1 patent drawingFigure 2B

AI summary

A method for optimizing a welding process to produce a weld joint having a predetermined strength includes measuring a plurality of melt layer thicknesses of weld joints for a plurality of sample assemblies formed by the welding process, measuring a plurality failure loads of weld joints for the plurality of sample assemblies, each of the measured plurality of failures loads being associated with one of the measured plurality of melt layer thicknesses, selecting a first failure load from the plurality of measured failure loads responsive to determining that the first failure load corresponds to a predetermined weld strength, and selecting a first melt layer thickness from the plurality of measured melt layer thicknesses that is associated with the selected first measured failure load.