Ultrasonic Weld Melt Layer Thickness Control for Consistent Strength

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Ultrasonic welding of thermoplastics faces challenges in achieving consistent weld quality due to real-life variations in part dimensions and limited control over molten material displacement, particularly in pneumatically driven systems, which affects the consistency and strength of welds.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the measurement of melt layer thicknesses and failure loads of sample assemblies to determine optimal weld process settings, allowing for the formation of production assemblies with weld joints of predetermined strength by adjusting parameters such as weld velocity and dynamic hold distance to achieve consistent melt layer thickness and high weld strength.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If time, energy, or weld distance control modes are used in ultrasonic welding, then the welding process is fast and economical, but the consistency of the weld cannot be assured due to variations in part dimensions and limited control over molten material displacement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewelding speedVSAvoidweld consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the control parameter from time/energy/distance to melt layer thickness. By directly controlling and measuring the melt layer thickness during ultrasonic welding, the process achieves both high productivity and consistent weld quality, resolving the contradiction between welding speed and weld consistency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback control by measuring the melt layer thickness in real-time during the welding process and using this information to adjust welding parameters. This closed-loop control ensures consistent weld quality while maintaining high welding speed, addressing both productivity and manufacturing precision requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of manufacture

If pneumatically driven ultrasonic welders are used, then the welding process is simple and economical, but the ability to control the rate of molten material displacement is limited, affecting weld strength

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewelding system simplicityVSAvoidweld joint strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces pneumatic control with a measurement and control system that directly monitors and adjusts melt layer thickness. This substitution enables precise control over molten material displacement rate, significantly improving weld joint strength while maintaining ease of manufacture through straightforward implementation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If real-life variations in part dimensions occur, then the welding process must accommodate diverse parts, but the consistency of weld quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepart dimension toleranceVSAvoidweld quality consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses feedback control where the melt layer thickness is measured and used to adjust welding parameters in real-time. This compensates for variations in part dimensions, maintaining consistent weld quality across diverse parts and resolving the contradiction between adaptability and manufacturing precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically changes welding parameters based on measured melt layer thickness, allowing the process to adapt to different part dimensions while maintaining consistent weld quality. This parameter adjustment strategy resolves the contradiction between versatility and precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the production of weld joints with consistent and high strength, closely correlated to the parent material strength, by accurately controlling the melt layer thickness and displacement during the welding process, thereby improving the reliability and efficiency of ultrasonic welding.

Implementation Method 1

ultrasonic welding of thermoplastics

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectUltrasonic vibration: Ultrasonic Vibration

Implementation Method 2

The ultrasonic welding process is fast, economical and easily automated

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction heating: Friction

Implementation Method 3

rate of molten material displacement

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting: Melting

Implementation Method 4

form an assembly

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolidification: Freezing

Data Source

PatentUS11135778B2Methods for determining a melt layer thickness associated with a predetermined weld strength based on a correlation therebetween
Publication Date: 2021.10.05 DUKANE IAS LLC
  • US11135778B2 patent drawing
  • US11135778B2 patent drawing
  • US11135778B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for optimizing a welding process to produce a weld joint having a predetermined strength includes measuring a plurality of melt layer thicknesses of weld joints for a plurality of sample assemblies formed by the welding process, measuring a plurality failure loads of weld joints for the plurality of sample assemblies, each of the measured plurality of failures loads being associated with one of the measured plurality of melt layer thicknesses, selecting a first failure load from the plurality of measured failure loads responsive to determining that the first failure load corresponds to a predetermined weld strength, and selecting a first melt layer thickness from the plurality of measured melt layer thicknesses that is associated with the selected first measured failure load.