Ultrasonic Welding Temperature Feedback for Monomaterial Films

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Ultrasonic welding machines face challenges in reliably welding monomaterial films with similar melting temperatures, leading to a narrow process window and requiring experienced personnel to adjust parameters, which is time-consuming and prone to errors.

Innovation Solution

The method involves measuring the actual temperature of the flat material during welding, comparing it to a predetermined target temperature, and adjusting the welding amplitude accordingly to maintain the desired process window, even with changes in welding speed or material thickness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If monomaterial films with similar melting temperatures are used, then material uniformity and structural integrity are improved, but the process window becomes very narrow making welding difficult to control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial uniformityVSAvoidwelding temperature control
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback control system that continuously monitors the actual temperature of the flat material during welding and compares it to a target temperature. Based on this comparison, the welding amplitude is automatically adjusted to maintain the desired temperature, ensuring reliable welding despite the narrow process window inherent in monomaterial films.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts the welding amplitude parameter based on real-time temperature measurements and process conditions. This allows the system to adapt to variations in welding speed, material thickness, and thermal conditions, maintaining optimal welding parameters throughout the process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If welding speed is increased to improve productivity, then production output is improved, but the temperature achieved at film layers decreases requiring parameter re-optimization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewelding speedVSAvoidfilm layer temperature
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback control system monitors temperature in real-time and automatically adjusts welding amplitude to compensate for temperature changes caused by varying welding speeds. This eliminates the need for manual parameter re-optimization when productivity requirements change.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static welding parameters to dynamic parameter adjustment, where welding amplitude is continuously adapted based on actual process conditions. This allows the system to maintain optimal welding temperature across a range of welding speeds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If manual parameter adjustment by experienced personnel is used to maintain narrow process window, then welding reliability is improved, but operation complexity and training requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewelding reliabilityVSAvoidparameter adjustment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The automated feedback control system replaces manual parameter adjustment by embedding the expertise of experienced personnel into the control algorithm. The system automatically senses temperature deviations and adjusts welding amplitude accordingly, making the process reliable without requiring operator expertise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-adjustment of welding parameters based on real-time temperature feedback, eliminating the need for operator intervention. The control system serves itself by automatically detecting process deviations and correcting them through amplitude adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Manufacturing precision

If continuous temperature monitoring and amplitude adjustment is implemented, then welding consistency is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewelding temperature consistencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback loop that uses temperature sensors to monitor material temperature and automatically adjusts welding amplitude. This relatively simple feedback mechanism achieves consistent welding temperature without requiring complex control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex manual mechanical adjustment systems with an automated control system that uses electronic sensing and actuation. This substitution simplifies the overall system architecture while achieving superior temperature consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for easy and reliable operation of ultrasonic welding machines by automatically adjusting the welding amplitude based on real-time temperature measurements, reducing rejects and requiring less expertise to maintain optimal welding conditions.

Implementation Method 1

The sonotrode is vibrated at an ultrasonic frequency with a welding amplitude

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectUltrasonic vibration: Ultrasonic Vibration

Implementation Method 2

only the film layers facing each other are melted by ultrasonic input during the welding operation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectUltrasonic heating: Ultrasonic Vibration

Implementation Method 3

measuring the ACTUAL temperature of the flat material during a welding phase

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTemperature measurement:

Implementation Method 4

comparing the ACTUAL temperature to a predetermined TARGET temperature, and varying the welding amplitude on the basis of the comparison result

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal feedback control:

Data Source

PatentUS12311610B2Method for operating an ultrasonic welding machine
Publication Date: 2025.05.27 HERRMANN ULTRACHALLTECHNIK GMBH & CO KG
  • US12311610B2 patent drawing
  • US12311610B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for operating an ultrasonic welding machine. During a welding process, a flat material is continuously moved through a gap formed between a sonotrode (1), which is vibrated at an ultrasonic frequency with a welding amplitude, and an anvil (2) at a welding speed while a welding force is exerted onto the flat material by the anvil (2) and/or the sonotrode (1). The invention is characterised in that during a welding phase, the ACTUAL temperature of the flat material is measured after the flat material has passed through the gap, the ACTUAL temperature is compared with a predetermined TARGET temperature, and the welding amplitude is varied on the basis of the comparison result.