Ultrasound Microbubble Interference Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Microbubbles generated during focused ultrasound procedures interfere with therapeutic ultrasound waves, causing distortion and potential tissue damage due to their non-linear reaction and unpredictable behavior, especially when traversing the human skull.

Innovation Solution

The system identifies high-throughput areas within the skull where microbubbles accumulate and uses acoustic radiation force or ultrasound steering beams to reduce their number, sweeping them into low-throughput areas to minimize interference and maximize acoustic energy delivery at the focal zone.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If focused ultrasound waves are transmitted through the skull to treat brain tissue, then therapeutic effect is achieved, but microbubbles are generated that reflect and scatter ultrasound waves, deteriorating focus and reducing intensity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetherapeutic effectVSAvoidmicrobubble interference
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary characterization of skull regions as high-throughput or low-throughput areas before treatment. By identifying HTAs in advance and monitoring microbubbles in these regions, the system can take preventive actions (sweeping or collapsing microbubbles) before they significantly interfere with the therapeutic ultrasound, thus maintaining reliable treatment effect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the microbubbles themselves as tools to solve the problem they cause. By applying acoustic radiation force or steering beams to the microbubbles, the system sweeps them from HTAs to LTAs or induces their collapse, converting the harmful microbubble population into a controllable element that can be manipulated to improve ultrasound focusing and intensity at the target.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

2Reliability

If microbubbles are present in high-throughput areas, then they accumulate and cause non-linear reactions, but removing them requires additional ultrasound interventions that may affect treatment time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepredictability of tissue reactionVSAvoidtreatment time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses the therapeutic ultrasound waves themselves to perform the microbubble removal function. The same acoustic field intended for treatment is used to generate acoustic radiation force that sweeps microbubbles from HTAs to LTAs, or to induce cavitation that collapses microbubbles. This self-service approach eliminates the need for separate removal interventions, avoiding additional treatment time while ensuring predictable tissue reaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Use of energy by moving object

If ultrasound energy is focused through the skull, then the focal zone receives sufficient intensity for treatment, but microbubbles scatter and reflect waves, reducing the intensity at the focus

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacoustic energy at focal zoneVSAvoidenergy loss to microbubbles
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts microbubbles from the high-throughput areas where they would otherwise interfere with ultrasound propagation. By sweeping microbubbles from HTAs to LTAs or inducing their collapse, the system removes the energy-absorbing and scattering elements from the critical ultrasound path, ensuring that acoustic energy is delivered efficiently to the focal zone without significant loss to microbubble interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Ease of operation

If the skull is traversed by ultrasound waves, then brain tissue can be treated, but irregularities in skull shape, density, and sound speed destroy focus and decrease spatial registration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoninvasive treatment capabilityVSAvoidfocusing precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different characteristics to different skull regions by classifying them as high-throughput or low-throughput areas based on local properties such as thickness, density, and sound speed variations. This local characterization allows the system to adaptively manage microbubble monitoring and removal in HTAs while accepting that LTAs will have reduced energy transmission, thereby maintaining overall focusing precision despite skull irregularities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively reduces microbubble interference, optimizing ultrasound wave focusing and preventing unintended tissue damage from cavitation, thereby enhancing the precision and safety of ultrasound treatments.

Implementation Method 1

The transducer converts an electronic drive signal into mechanical vibrations, resulting in the emission of acoustic waves

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoelectric effect: Piezoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 2

a single transducer may be formed of a plurality of individually driven transducer elements whose phases can each be controlled independently. Such a 'phased-array' transducer facilitates steering the focal zone to different locations by adjusting the relative phases among the transducers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase interference: Interference

Implementation Method 3

microbubbles may reflect and/or scatter ultrasound waves, and further deteriorate the focus or reduce the intensity thereof

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic reflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 4

microbubbles may reflect and/or scatter ultrasound waves

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic scattering: Scattering

Implementation Method 5

the microbubbles may collapse due to the applied stress from an acoustic field; this mechanism, called 'cavitation,' may cause extensive tissue damage beyond that targeted

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic cavitation: Cavitation

Implementation Method 6

an acoustic radiation force created by the ultrasound waves themselves... to sweep the microbubbles from an HTA region into an LTA region

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic radiation force: Acoustic Radiation Pressure

Implementation Method 7

an ultrasound steering beam may be created to apply stress on the microbubbles in order to induce microbubble collapse

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic cavitation: Cavitation

Data Source

PatentUS10589129B2Therapeutic ultrasound with reduced interference from microbubbles
Publication Date: 2020.03.17 INSIGHTEC
  • US10589129B2 patent drawing
  • US10589129B2 patent drawing
  • US10589129B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various approaches for reducing microbubble interference with ultrasound waves transmitted from multiple transducer elements and traversing tissue onto a target region include measuring microbubbles in high-throughput areas of ultrasound exposure and reducing the amount of microbubbles using the ultrasound waves.