Ultrasound Pattern Recognition for Trauma Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems for automatic focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) exams face challenges in accurately and efficiently identifying internal trauma, such as pneumothorax and hemothorax, especially in field settings where expertise and equipment limitations exist.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that filters ultrasonic images to remove artifacts, identifies specific patterns like A-line, B-line, lung sliding, and barcode patterns, and applies rules to diagnose internal trauma using a processor and analysis engine, integrated into a portable, user-friendly device for rapid and accurate detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If automatic pattern recognition algorithms are implemented to improve diagnostic accuracy, then the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The diagnostic system segments the complex task of trauma detection into distinct pattern recognition modules, each specializing in identifying specific ultrasound patterns (e.g., lung sliding, barcode, seashore patterns). This modular approach improves diagnostic accuracy for different trauma types while managing system complexity through organized, reusable components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediate layer of automated pattern recognition algorithms that act as mediators between the raw ultrasound images and the final diagnostic conclusions. This intermediary processing layer enhances measurement precision by systematically analyzing patterns that may be difficult for human operators to detect consistently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If automated analysis is used to reduce training time for novice users, then the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining timeVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service functionality by automatically analyzing ultrasound images and providing diagnostic assistance without requiring extensive user training. The automated pattern recognition algorithms perform the complex analysis tasks that would otherwise require highly trained operators, thereby reducing training time while the system handles its own analytical requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the mechanical aspect of human expert analysis with automated computational algorithms. Instead of relying on the mechanical skill and experience of trained operators, the system uses computer-based pattern recognition to perform the same diagnostic function, reducing the need for extensive training while managing device complexity through software implementation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If multiple pattern recognition algorithms are implemented to detect various trauma types, then the processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrauma detection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-programming multiple pattern recognition algorithms that can simultaneously or sequentially analyze different trauma patterns. This preliminary preparation of analytical tools allows the system to quickly match observed ultrasound patterns against known trauma signatures, improving detection accuracy without excessive processing time during actual use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial action by implementing a hierarchy of pattern recognition algorithms, where more critical or common trauma patterns are analyzed with higher priority and computational resources. Not all patterns require equal processing intensity, allowing the system to maintain high detection accuracy for critical conditions while managing overall processing speed through selective analysis depth.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10217213B2Automatic focused assessment with sonography for trauma exams
Publication Date: 2019.02.26 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA THE AS REPRESENTED BY THE SEC OF THE ARMY
  • US10217213B2 patent drawing
  • US10217213B2 patent drawing
  • US10217213B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An embodiment of the invention provides a method for identifying internal trauma in a patient for pneumothorax, hemothorax and abdominal hemorrhage using ultrasound in B-modes with radial, longitudinal, phased array probes, and with M-mode for verification of lung sliding and lung point. Identifications are based on statistical classifications of image features, including A-line, B-line, lung sliding, barcode, sky, seashore, and beach patterns. For blood pools, a polygon is fitted to the boundary, and a cellular automaton extracts local interference patterns due to cavity shape. Logic is then applied to extractions to identify the trauma. With B-mode, feature extraction involves specialized algorithms operating at frame rate for tracking of features such as ribs and rib shadows, pleural line and fast changes in peak intensities along the pleural line. Results are presented on screen by means of highlighting and textual cues.