Automatic Umbrella Spring Segmentation for Force Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Automatic non-collapsible umbrellas face manufacturing difficulties due to increased pole length, which leads to elastic fatigue in components, and pose safety risks if not used carefully, as the enhanced spring mechanism can cause injury.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates a center post with a control mechanism featuring a cylindrical main seat, cylindrical control seat, and a detent mechanism with a rod member and collapse biasing member, along with a runner assembly including a stretch biasing member, allowing for independent operation of the umbrella's opening and closing mechanisms with reduced required force, utilizing a system of buttons and resistance members to manage the elastic force effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the spring is greatly enhanced to facilitate opening or closing, then the ease of operation is improved, but the safety risk increases and can hurt the user

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of opening or closingVSAvoidsafety risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The spring mechanism is divided into two separate springs: a first spring for opening the umbrella and a second spring for closing the umbrella. This segmentation allows each spring to be optimized for its specific function with appropriate force levels, preventing the excessive force problem while maintaining ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters of the spring system by using two springs with different elastic coefficients rather than one enhanced spring. The first spring has an elastic coefficient optimized for opening force, while the second spring has an elastic coefficient optimized for closing force, both within safe ranges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Length of moving object

If the length of the pole increases, then the manufacturing difficulty increases and components are prone to elastic fatigue

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepole lengthVSAvoidelastic fatigue resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The pole is divided into multiple segments that can be connected and disconnected. This allows the pole to be transported in a compact form and assembled to the required length at the destination, avoiding the elastic fatigue issues associated with long continuous poles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The pole structure is made dynamic and adjustable, allowing it to change length based on usage requirements. This dynamic configuration optimizes both the pole length for functionality and the reliability by avoiding excessive length that would cause elastic fatigue.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If a single spring is used for both opening and closing, then the device complexity is reduced, but the reliability decreases due to malfunction from elastic fatigue

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of spring componentsVSAvoidmalfunction resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The single spring system is segmented into two separate springs with distinct functions. The first spring is dedicated to opening operations and the second spring is dedicated to closing operations. This functional segmentation prevents the elastic fatigue and malfunction issues that arise from a single spring performing both functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each spring is designed to automatically perform its specific function without interference from the other operations. The first spring self-services the opening function and the second spring self-services the closing function, eliminating the cross-contamination of stresses that leads to malfunction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design minimizes the force needed to open or close the umbrella, reduces the likelihood of malfunction, and enhances safety by distributing the elastic force effectively, ensuring the umbrella operates reliably and safely over time.

Implementation Method 1

the stored elastic force of the stretch biasing member is released to push the top grommet and the slotted intermediate ring further apart, thereby opening the skeleton

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic force: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

the stored elastic force of the collapse biasing member is released to urge its top against and push up the enhancement tube, and the top grommet moves upward, thereby closing the skeleton

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic force: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS10292468B2Automatic opening or closing umbrella
Publication Date: 2019.05.21 YOU CHING CHUAN
  • US10292468B2 patent drawing
  • US10292468B2 patent drawing
  • US10292468B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An automatic non-collapsible umbrella includes a handle, a control mechanism, a center post, a detent mechanism, a runner assembly, and a skeleton. A cylindrical main seat of the control mechanism includes a spring biased open button for opening the umbrella, and a spring biased collapse button adjacent to the collapse button for closing the umbrella.