UML Testing Profile for Automated Software Test Generation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current software testing methods lack efficient automation and integration of test aspects into the development process, leading to increased costs and reduced effectiveness in ensuring software security and functionality.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a Unified Modeling Language (UML) testing profile and Test Development Environment (TDE/UML) for automated generation of test cases, utilizing a UML 2.0 testing profile (U2TP) to create executable tests and harness test cases, which include a test harness system for evaluating test pass/no pass results.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If automated test generation is implemented using UML testing profile, then test automation and integration into development process is improved, but device complexity and implementation difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetest automationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The test generation system is divided into separate modular components: UML profile definition module, test case generation module, and test execution module. This segmentation allows each component to be developed and maintained independently, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high automation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The UML testing profile framework is designed to be universal and language-independent, capable of generating test cases for multiple software systems and development environments. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate testing tools for different scenarios, simplifying the overall testing infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If testing is integrated early into software development process, then test effectiveness and software security is improved, but development time and initial effort increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoftware securityVSAvoiddevelopment time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Test cases are generated automatically from UML diagrams during the design phase, before actual coding begins. This preliminary action ensures that testing is embedded early in the development process, improving software security without significantly extending the overall development timeline, as tests are created in parallel with design activities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides continuous feedback through automated test execution and result analysis, allowing developers to identify and fix issues early in the development cycle. This feedback mechanism improves software security by catching defects early, while the automation reduces the time penalty typically associated with early testing integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If manual test case creation is used, then flexibility and customization is improved, but productivity and testing efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetest customizationVSAvoidtesting efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service test generation by automatically creating test cases from UML diagrams without requiring manual test case authoring. This automation dramatically improves testing efficiency and productivity while maintaining adaptability, as the generated test cases can be customized by modifying the UML model or generation parameters rather than manually rewriting test cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS7950004B2Devices systems and methods for testing software
Publication Date: 2011.05.24 SIEMENS CORP
  • US7950004B2 patent drawing
  • US7950004B2 patent drawing
  • US7950004B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Certain exemplary embodiments comprise a method comprising rendering a verdict indicative of whether a predetermined software system functions in a predetermined manner. The verdict can be determined based upon machine instructions. The machine instructions can be automatically generated via a module adapted to parse and/or load an Extensible Markup Language XML file indicative of a test case.