Uncertainty Management in Decision-Making Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Human decision-makers face challenges in processing large amounts of data with inherent uncertainties, as current automated systems often oversimplify complex decisions by hiding uncertainty information, leading to sub-optimal choices.

Innovation Solution

An assisted decision-making system that utilizes multiple decision algorithms to quantify and reconcile uncertainty categories, providing global uncertainty parameters to decision-makers through a structured argument framework, enabling them to account for various sources of uncertainty.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If automated systems simplify uncertainty representation by thresholding or presenting single uncertainty values, then ease of operation is improved, but loss of information increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of useVSAvoidinformation loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The uncertainty information is segmented into multiple distinct uncertainty categories (e.g., aleatory uncertainty, epistemic uncertainty, model uncertainty) rather than presenting a single aggregated value. Each category is quantified separately using specific uncertainty parameters, allowing decision-makers to understand different sources of uncertainty while maintaining manageable presentation through structured categorization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If multiple uncertainty categories are quantified and reconciled, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuncertainty quantification accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

An uncertainty management component acts as an intermediary between multiple decision algorithms and the decision-maker. This component receives uncertainty parameters from various algorithms, reconciles them through systematic processes, and produces integrated uncertainty assessments. The intermediary manages the complexity internally while presenting organized results externally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms raw uncertainty data into standardized uncertainty parameters across different categories. By changing the parameter representation and applying reconciliation algorithms, the system achieves precise multi-dimensional uncertainty quantification while managing complexity through parameter standardization and systematic processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS7606784B2Uncertainty management in a decision-making system
Publication Date: 2009.10.20 NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP
  • US7606784B2 patent drawing
  • US7606784B2 patent drawing
  • US7606784B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are provided for constructing and evaluating a story of interest. The system includes a plurality of decision algorithms. Each decision algorithm is operative to quantify at least one category of uncertainty associated with the story of interest as a set of at least one uncertainty parameter. An uncertainty management component is operative to reconcile the sets of uncertainty parameters from the plurality of decision algorithms as to produce a global uncertainty parameter for each of the plurality of uncertainty categories for the story of interest.