Uncertainty-Based Medical Image Selection for Deep Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Deep learning algorithms in image analysis, such as medical image analysis, face challenges in training due to the reliance on qualitative data, where over-represented and obvious cases have little impact on learning performance, while difficult cases with high uncertainty are more impactful but often overlooked.

Innovation Solution

A semi-automated system identifies and prioritizes images with high uncertainty for human review and annotation, focusing on difficult cases to enhance the training data for deep learning algorithms by analyzing image features and confidence scores, and incorporating expert feedback to improve classification accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If deep learning algorithms use routine images with obvious cases for training, then the training process is simple and fast, but the learning performance improvement is minimal due to diminishing returns

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining speedVSAvoidlearning performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameter of image selection criteria from routine obvious cases to difficult uncertain cases by computing uncertainty metrics and selecting images that exceed a threshold, thereby improving learning performance while maintaining training efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The deep learning algorithm automatically identifies its own difficult cases by computing uncertainty metrics, and the system autonomously selects and prioritizes these cases for training without requiring manual intervention, enabling self-improving training

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If deep learning algorithms focus on difficult cases with high uncertainty for training, then the learning performance improves significantly, but the data collection and analysis process becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelearning performanceVSAvoiddata collection process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual expert review with an automated image manipulation stage that computes uncertainty metrics and selects difficult cases algorithmically, reducing the complexity of the data collection process while maintaining focus on high-value training images

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary image manipulation stage between image acquisition and training that automatically identifies and prioritizes difficult cases through uncertainty computation, simplifying the overall process while ensuring high-performance training data selection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If all images are reviewed and annotated by experts, then the training data quality is maximized, but the time and resources required increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining data qualityVSAvoidannotation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the difficult cases with high uncertainty from the complete image set and directs them for expert annotation, while routine cases are handled automatically, significantly reducing annotation time while maintaining training data quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of annotating all images, the system applies partial action by selectively annotating only the subset of difficult cases that exceed the uncertainty threshold, achieving sufficient training data quality with reduced time and resource investment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11380433B2Optimized data collection of relevant medical images
Publication Date: 2022.07.05 MERATIVE US LP
  • US11380433B2 patent drawing
  • US11380433B2 patent drawing
  • US11380433B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Some embodiments of the present invention select image data that are valuable for developing and/or training a deep learning based algorithm. A semi-automated system identifies cases that are the most valuable (most impactful, useful, and/or most effective) for developing and/or training the deep learning algorithm. The semi-automated system monitors a degree of uncertainty in the results produced by an image processing algorithm. Cases where the degree of uncertainty is high, and consequently a confidence score is low, are made ready for analysis, classification, and/or annotation by human review. Once analyzed, classified and/or annotated by human review, the data is made available for use in developing and/or training the deep learning algorithm.