Uncomfortable Sound Pressure Evaluation Using EEG Event-Related Potentials

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current techniques for estimating uncomfortable sound pressure levels in hearing aid fitting are inaccurate, leading to potential overbearing sounds being output to users, which can cause discomfort and require multiple fittings to adjust correctly.

Innovation Solution

An uncomfortable sound pressure evaluation system that measures electroencephalogram signals, presents sound stimulation groups of varying frequencies, extracts event-related potential information, estimates uncomfortable sound pressure, and corrects estimated values to a maximum acceptable level to prevent overbearing sounds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If UCL is estimated by conventional electroencephalogram technique using non-loud sound pressure, then individual UCL estimation is enabled, but there is a relatively large error between estimated UCL and actually-measured UCL

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveUCL estimation accuracyVSAvoidindividual UCL estimation reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary classification of users into high-UCL and low-UCL groups based on electroencephalogram responses to non-loud sounds before determining the final UCL value. This preliminary action enables the system to apply different determination methods (actual measurement vs. estimation) based on the user's classification, thereby improving overall estimation accuracy while maintaining reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses electroencephalogram responses to non-loud sounds as a proxy or copy to predict UCL for loud sounds. By analyzing the brain's response pattern to safe-level sounds and using this as a reference copy, the system can estimate UCL without necessarily exposing the user to actually loud sounds, reducing measurement error while maintaining individualization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Ease of operation

If UCL is determined through calculation from hearing threshold level, then measurement process is simplified, but UCL does not reflect individual differences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement process simplicityVSAvoidindividual difference reflection
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback from electroencephalogram measurements to adjust and personalize UCL determination. Instead of relying solely on universal calculation formulas, the system uses real-time brain response feedback from each user to determine their specific UCL characteristics, thereby reflecting individual differences while maintaining operational feasibility through automated measurement and processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If estimated UCL with large error is used for hearing aid adjustment, then fitting process can proceed, but overbearing sounds may be output causing user discomfort

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefitting process efficiencyVSAvoiduser discomfort from overbearing sounds
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary classification of users into high-UCL and low-UCL groups before final hearing aid adjustment. This preliminary action allows the system to identify users who are at risk of discomfort and apply more conservative or accurate determination methods for their UCL values, preventing overbearing sounds while maintaining efficient fitting processes for users with accurate estimates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies beforehand cushioning by using electroencephalogram-based classification to identify potential risks before final hearing aid programming. By detecting users with high-UCL characteristics or large estimation errors in advance, the system can adjust parameters conservatively or perform additional verification, cushioning against the harmful effect of overbearing sounds before they occur during actual use

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system reduces estimation errors in uncomfortable sound pressure levels, ensuring safer hearing aid fittings by preventing overbearing sounds and reducing the need for multiple adjustments.

Implementation Method 1

a measurement section, configured to measure an electroencephalogram signal of a user

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectroencephalogram:

Implementation Method 2

an extraction section, configured to extract, for each sound stimulation group, information concerning event-related potential from the electroencephalogram signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvent-related potential:

Data Source

PatentUS9439013B2Uncomfortable sound pressure evaluation system, uncomfortable sound pressure evaluation apparatus, uncomfortable sound pressure adjustment apparatus, uncomfortable sound pressure evaluation method, and computer program thereof
Publication Date: 2016.09.06 PANASONIC INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT CO LTD
  • US9439013B2 patent drawing
  • US9439013B2 patent drawing
  • US9439013B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An exemplary uncomfortable sound pressure evaluation system consecutively presents sound stimulation groups to a user. Each sound stimulation group includes a sound stimulation, and the sound stimulation groups differ in frequency from one another. The system includes: an extraction section configured to extract, for each sound stimulation group, information concerning event-related potential relating to the sound stimulation; an estimation section configured to estimate an uncomfortable sound pressure (UCL) of the user from the information concerning event-related potential; and a correction section configured to determine whether the estimated UCL is higher than a predefined maximum UCL or not, and if a proportion of those determination results which indicate the UCL to be higher than the maximum UCL is smaller than predetermined, correcting each UCL determined as higher than the maximum UCL to a sound pressure equal to or less than the maximum UCL.