Undercut Fastener Threadforms for Multi-Axial Bone Fixation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional fastener thread designs fail to provide sufficient fixation against multi-axial forces and off-axis loading scenarios, leading to potential loosening of surgical fasteners implanted in bone and other tissues.

Innovation Solution

Manufacturing undercut threadforms on fasteners involves a method using multiple cutting processes to create opposing undercut surfaces on helical threads, allowing for enhanced bone fixation and load sharing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If traditional fastener thread designs are used, then manufacturing is simple, but fixation strength against multi-axial forces is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefixation strengthVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting process is divided into multiple sequential cutting passes, with each pass creating a specific portion of the undercut threadform geometry. This segmentation allows complex undercut surfaces to be manufactured using standard cutting tools and processes, rather than requiring a single complex operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces oblique cutting trajectories that move the cutting tool along three-dimensional paths relative to the fastener axis. This dimensional approach enables creation of undercut surfaces with complex spatial geometry, achieving superior fixation strength while using conventional cutting equipment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Manufacturing precision

If undercut threadforms are manufactured using conventional methods, then bone fixation is improved, but manufacturing precision is difficult to achieve

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveundercut surface precisionVSAvoidcutting process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The manufacturing process is divided into multiple cutting passes, each responsible for creating specific undercut surfaces. This segmentation allows precise control over the geometry of each surface while using standard cutting tools, achieving high manufacturing precision without requiring complex single-step processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cutting process employs dynamic oblique trajectories that adjust the cutting tool's path in three-dimensional space. This dynamic approach enables precise formation of complex undercut geometries by controlling the relative motion between tool and workpiece, achieving high precision through motion control rather than complex tooling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20250296167A1Enhanced devices, systems, and methods for manufacturing undercut threadforms on fasteners
Publication Date: 2025.09.25 RTG SCIENTIFIC LLC
  • US20250296167A1 patent drawing
  • US20250296167A1 patent drawing
  • US20250296167A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Opposing undercut surfaces may be formed on a helical thread disposed about a shaft of a fastener by: rotating the shaft; translating a first cutting head medially toward the shaft along a first oblique trajectory of a first oblique cutting surface of the first cutting head; translating the first cutting head along a length of the shaft to form at least one of the opposing undercut surfaces on the helical thread; translating a second cutting head medially toward the shaft along a second oblique trajectory of a second oblique cutting surface of the second cutting head; and translating the second cutting head along a length of the shaft to form at least another one of the opposing undercut surfaces on the helical thread.