Underground Detection Device With Machine Learning Signal Evaluation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing detection methods for underground objects are limited in their ability to provide detailed and reliable non-destructive detection results, often requiring complex adjustments and user intervention, and struggle with variability in detection accuracy due to different collection situations.

Innovation Solution

A detection device utilizing machine learning processes to evaluate detection signals, allowing for automated adjustment and simplified operation by dividing example values into groups based on cluster formation and using nearest neighbor classification, with a dataset comprising user data for robust model creation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional detection methods are used to detect underground objects, then the detection device can operate without machine learning processes, but the detection accuracy and reliability are limited and require complex manual adjustments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidcomplex adjustments
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The detection device automatically adapts to different collection situations through machine learning processes. The system self-adjusts by processing example values, performing cluster formation, and selecting appropriate evaluation parameters without requiring manual intervention or complex user adjustments, thereby improving detection accuracy while maintaining operational simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary processing of example values through cluster formation and nearest neighbor classification before actual detection. By pre-grouping example values and pre-selecting evaluation parameters based on similarity, the system prepares optimal detection settings in advance, eliminating the need for complex real-time adjustments during operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If traditional detection methods are used, then the operation procedure is simple without machine learning, but the detection results lack detail and reliability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection result reliabilityVSAvoiduser interaction
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from example values and cluster formation results to continuously improve detection reliability. By comparing new detection signals with grouped example values and selecting the most appropriate evaluation parameters based on similarity, the system automatically refines its detection accuracy while requiring minimal user interaction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual adjustment mechanisms with automated machine learning processes. Instead of requiring users to manually configure detection parameters, the system uses computational algorithms including cluster formation, nearest neighbor classification, and automatic parameter selection to achieve reliable detection results with minimal user involvement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If manual evaluation parameter assignment is used for each example value, then the model can be trained with detailed parameters, but the teach-in phase becomes time-consuming and complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel training precisionVSAvoidteach-in phase duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the large set of example values into smaller clusters based on similarity through cluster formation. By grouping example values with comparable characteristics, the system reduces the number of individual evaluations needed during training, significantly reducing the teach-in phase duration while maintaining comprehensive model coverage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates representative copies of evaluation parameters from similar example values within the same cluster. Instead of manually assigning parameters to each individual example value, the system copies parameters from representative examples in each cluster, dramatically reducing the time required for model training while preserving training precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS20250224535A1Method for a Detection Device; Detection Device
Publication Date: 2025.07.10 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US20250224535A1 patent drawing
  • US20250224535A1 patent drawing
  • US20250224535A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for operating a detection device includes providing a detection device configured to non-destructively acquire a detection signal from an object arranged within an underground examination region. The method further includes assigning the detection signal to a detection result based on a machine learning process, in order to output the detection result and/or to use this to adjust the detection device.