Roofing Underlayment Gripping Structures for Installer Safety

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional synthetic roofing underlayments have a smooth surface that poses a slipping hazard for roofing installers, especially in wet, humid, or dusty conditions.

Innovation Solution

A multilayer structure with a reinforcement and a film, featuring a plurality of gripping structures on the film surface, which enhances walkability by providing traction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the underlayment surface is made smooth, then water infiltration protection is improved, but walkability and anti-slip performance deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater infiltration protectionVSAvoidwalkability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The underlayment surface is divided into different zones with different properties: the bulk material remains smooth for water protection, while the top surface features gripping structures in specific patterns to provide traction. This local differentiation allows the smooth areas to protect against water infiltration while the gripping zones enhance walkability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The continuous smooth surface is segmented into discrete gripping structures (protrusions, ridges, or textured elements) arranged in specific patterns. This segmentation provides multiple contact points for footwear while maintaining the overall smoothness of the underlayment for water protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If gripping structures are added to the surface, then walkability is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovewalkabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The gripping structures are created by modifying surface parameters (height, spacing, pattern density) rather than adding entirely separate components. This allows the gripping features to be integrated into the underlayment manufacturing process through extrusion, embossing, or coating techniques, minimizing additional manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The underlayment combines the base waterproof membrane material with a surface layer or treatment that provides gripping structures. This composite approach allows each layer to perform its primary function while the combined structure delivers both water protection and enhanced walkability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The multilayer structure improves walkability and prevents slipping on the roofing underlayment, ensuring safer working conditions for installers.

Implementation Method 1

a bonding material, wherein the bonding material adheres the first reinforcement surface to the second film surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Data Source

PatentUS20250188742A1Multilayer structure with enhanced walkability
Publication Date: 2025.06.12 OWENS CORNING INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL LLC
  • US20250188742A1 patent drawing
  • US20250188742A1 patent drawing
  • US20250188742A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A roofing underlayment with enhanced walkability is provided. The roofing underlayment has a reinforcement, a film, and a plurality of gripping structures. The gripping structures are disposed on at least a portion of a first film surface of the film. The roofing underlayment has at least one of a coefficient of friction of between about 1.2 and about 1.8 when tested in dry condition using COF method 1, a coefficient of friction of between about 0.8 and about 1.5 when tested in wet condition using COF method 1, and a coefficient of friction of between about 0.5 and about 1.2 using COF method 1.