Underwater Snake Robot Using Passive Joints for Long-Range Inspection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing underwater robots for subsea operations face limitations due to complex and expensive active motorized joints, which lead to increased maintenance needs, reduced agility, and limited operational range and power endurance, making them cumbersome and inefficient for tasks like inspecting subsea pipelines.

Innovation Solution

An underwater snake robot design utilizing passive joint modules connected by thrust devices for propulsion and orientation control, allowing for a flexible and robust structure with reduced complexity, lower maintenance, and enhanced operational capabilities, including a high length-to-diameter ratio for improved range and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If active motorized joints are used for propulsion, then the robot can achieve controlled movement, but the complexity and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrolled movementVSAvoidjoint module complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the complex active motorized joints from the system and extracts only the essential propulsion function, implementing it through a simpler thrust device that applies force directly to the robot body, eliminating the need for complex joint mechanisms while maintaining controlled movement capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical active motorized joint system with a thrust-based propulsion system that uses direct force application rather than complex mechanical articulation, substituting a simpler mechanical approach for the previously complex joint mechanism

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If active motorized joints are used, then propulsion control is achieved, but maintenance requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepropulsion controlVSAvoidmaintenance frequency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The patent adopts a simpler thrust device design that is easier to replace and maintain compared to complex motorized joints, treating the propulsion component as a more easily replaceable element that reduces overall maintenance burden and repair complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

By removing the complex motorized joint system and keeping only the essential thrust generation capability, the patent eliminates the maintenance-intensive components while preserving propulsion control functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Duration of action of moving object

If the robot size is increased to accommodate more power, then operational range extends, but mobility and agility are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational rangeVSAvoidmobility and agility
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a flexible, dynamically configurable robot body composed of multiple modular segments that can change configuration adaptively, allowing the robot to maintain agility while accommodating extended battery capacity for increased operational range

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The robot is divided into modular segments including battery modules, joint modules, and thrust devices that can be independently configured and arranged, allowing optimization of power capacity without compromising mobility through flexible segmentation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Ease of operation

If the robot is made compact for mobility, then agility improves, but power capacity and operational endurance are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveagilityVSAvoidpower capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the robot into modular components including separate battery modules that can be independently sized and configured, allowing the power capacity to be increased without proportionally increasing the overall robot volume, thus maintaining agility while expanding energy storage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The modular segments including batteries, joints, and thrust devices are arranged in a nested or compact configuration that maximizes power density while maintaining the robot's agile and flexible form factor

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design simplifies the robot's structure, reduces maintenance, and enhances operational efficiency and range by using passive joint modules and thrust devices, enabling effective subsea operations with reduced drag and increased power endurance, allowing for longer inspections and easier handling.

Implementation Method 1

one or more thrust devices for applying thrust to the robot for propulsion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThrust: Force

Implementation Method 2

a series of links that are connected to one another by one or more passive joint modules for allowing a flexural motion of the robot

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlexural motion: Deformation

Data Source

PatentUS20240025524A1Underwater snake robot with extreme length
Publication Date: 2024.01.25 EELUME AS
  • US20240025524A1 patent drawing
  • US20240025524A1 patent drawing
  • US20240025524A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An underwater snake robot 400 for performing subsea operations, the robot 400 comprising: a series of links 401, 402 that are connected to one another by one or more joint modules 404 for allowing a flexural motion of the robot; and one or more thrust devices for applying thrust to the robot 400 for propulsion and/or guidance; wherein the flexural motion and/or thrust device(s) enable movement of the robot 400 and control of the orientation and/or location of the links 401, 402, and wherein the robot 400 has a length to diameter ratio of at least 25:1.