Automated Underwriting Confidence Factor via Fuzzy Logic

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The insurance underwriting process is plagued by variability and inconsistency due to subjective underwriter judgment, ambiguous underwriting standards, and the need for manual processing of non-standard information like attending physician statements, which hinders automation and increases cycle time.

Innovation Solution

A process that determines a confidence factor for insurance applications by comparing them to previous underwritten cases, using fuzzy logic to adjust underwriting standards and translate conditional probabilities into soft constraints, enabling automated decision-making with a run-time function to evaluate confidence thresholds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If manual reading and processing of APS documents is performed by human underwriters, then non-standard information can be evaluated, but cycle time is greatly extended and underwriter variability increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to process non-standard informationVSAvoidcycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical manual reading process with an automated natural language processing system that can extract and evaluate information from APS documents. The system uses text analysis algorithms to identify key medical information, impairments, and risk factors without requiring human underwriters to manually read each document, thereby dramatically reducing cycle time while maintaining the ability to process non-standard information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary automated processing layer between the APS documents and the underwriting decision system. This intermediary system pre-processes the non-standard information, extracts relevant features, and structures them in a format suitable for automated evaluation, enabling the downstream system to handle non-standard information efficiently without requiring manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If automated underwriting is implemented, then productivity increases, but the system cannot handle non-standard or non-sufficient information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing capacityVSAvoidability to handle non-standard information
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms unstructured non-standard information into structured parameters that can be processed by automated systems. By applying natural language processing and text extraction techniques, the system converts free-text APS documents into standardized data fields and risk parameters, enabling automated underwriting to handle previously unprocessable non-standard information while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal information processing framework that can handle both structured and unstructured data types. The system is designed to process multiple formats of input information including standard forms, non-standard APS documents, and various data sources, unifying them into a common processing pipeline that maintains productivity while expanding adaptability to handle diverse information types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If subjective judgment of underwriters is used, then flexibility in interpreting underwriting standards is achieved, but variability and inconsistency in decisions increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterpretation flexibilityVSAvoiddecision consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the automated system learns from historical underwriting decisions and continuously refines its evaluation criteria. By analyzing patterns in experienced underwriters' decisions while maintaining consistency through systematic application of learned rules, the system captures interpretation flexibility while eliminating variability, achieving reliable and consistent decisions that reflect expert judgment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary analysis and evaluation of information sources before the actual underwriting decision is made. The system pre-identifies relevant risk factors, pre-evaluates information quality, and pre-structures data in a way that enables consistent application of underwriting standards, thereby ensuring decision consistency while preserving the ability to flexibly interpret standards based on the pre-processed information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8005693B2Process for determining a confidence factor for insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system
Publication Date: 2011.08.23 PACIFIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
  • US8005693B2 patent drawing
  • US8005693B2 patent drawing
  • US8005693B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A process is described for evaluating the decision-making confidence of a process and system for at least a partial underwriting of insurance policies where placement of an insurance application to an underwriting category is based on its similarity to previous insurance applications. The confidence factor computed is a measure of the correctness of the decision for a given application for insurance.