Underwriting System Integrating Social Network Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current insurance underwriting processes fail to adequately utilize the vast array of information available via the Internet, particularly from social and business networking sites, making it difficult to generate and analyze data for reliable and consistent rating and pricing policies, especially for small and medium-sized businesses with diverse risk characteristics.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for underwriting insurance policies using community and social networking data, which involves receiving social network rating data, applying weighting factors, and transmitting underwriting decisions based on this data to improve the specificity and flexibility of insurance rates and pricing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If conventional underwriting data sources (credit rating, historical loss data) are used, then underwriting decisions can be made with established statistical methods, but the underwriting process fails to utilize valuable information available from social and business networking sites

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunderwriting informationVSAvoiddata source versatility
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The underwriting system integrates multiple data sources including traditional credit rating agency data, historical loss information, claims data, and social network data from various platforms (Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, etc.). This multi-functional approach allows the system to universally process and analyze diverse information types to make comprehensive underwriting decisions, transforming the system from single-purpose to multi-purpose data utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces social networking sites as intermediary sources that connect insurers with additional information about policyholders. These social networks act as mediators that provide community-based ratings, reviews, and behavioral data that traditional underwriting channels cannot access, thereby bridging the information gap between conventional data sources and comprehensive risk assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If social network data is integrated into underwriting, then information completeness improves, but the complexity of data analysis and processing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunderwriting informationVSAvoidunderwriting system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The underwriting system segments social network data into distinct categories and sources (e.g., Facebook ratings, LinkedIn professional data, Twitter behavioral patterns, review sites like Angie's List). Each data source and type is processed through specialized modules that apply appropriate weighting factors, allowing the complex information to be broken down into manageable segments that can be analyzed independently before integration into the overall underwriting decision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies variable weighting factors to different social network data sources and data types based on their reliability, relevance, and predictive value. These parameters (weighting factors) are dynamically adjusted to optimize the contribution of each data source to the final underwriting decision, transforming the complex multi-source data into a standardized risk assessment framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If traditional underwriting methods are used for small and medium-sized businesses, then established statistical methods can be applied, but it becomes difficult to generate and analyze information for reliable rating and pricing policies across diverse business types and geographical locations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverating and pricing reliabilityVSAvoidbusiness type adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies location-specific and business-type-specific weighting factors to social network data. Different geographical locations, industry sectors, and business sizes receive customized data weights and analysis parameters. For example, professional network data from LinkedIn may be weighted more heavily for B2B services, while community review data may be weighted more for local retail businesses, allowing the system to adapt to local qualities and specific business characteristics while maintaining overall reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS8660864B2Systems and methods for intelligent underwriting based on community or social network data
Publication Date: 2014.02.25 HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE CO
  • US8660864B2 patent drawing
  • US8660864B2 patent drawing
  • US8660864B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for underwriting using community and/or social networking based data includes an automated insurance underwriting platform for rating and pricing insurance policies through the accessing and evaluating of community, social and business network based information. Community or social network rating data may be analyzed and weighting factors may be applied to the community or social network rating data. An underwriting decision for the potential entity to be insured may then be transmitted based at least in part on the community or social network rating data.