Undulating Variable Airgap Reluctance Actuator Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Variable airgap reluctance actuators face limitations in achieving medium displacement strokes due to the inverse square relationship between force and displacement distance, resulting in increased actuator mass and size, which restricts their use in applications like aerospace where larger displacement ranges are required.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating undulations on the opposed surfaces of the armature and stator core, allowing for a more efficient distribution and phasing of magnetic forces, which enhances the displacement range without significantly increasing the actuator's mass by optimizing the design of slots and projections.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Length of moving object

If the airgap width is increased to achieve medium displacement strokes, then the displacement range is improved, but the actuator mass increases significantly due to the inverse square relationship between force and displacement distance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedisplacement strokeVSAvoidactuator mass
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The opposed surfaces of the armature and stator are segmented into multiple undulating profiles with peaks and valleys. This segmentation creates multiple localized magnetic interaction zones that collectively produce the required force over a larger displacement range without proportionally increasing actuator mass

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The undulating profiles create local variations in airgap width across the surface area, with some regions having smaller airgaps for higher force density and other regions contributing to extended displacement range. This local quality variation optimizes the force-displacement characteristics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Length of moving object

If the airgap width is increased to achieve medium displacement strokes, then the displacement range is improved, but the actuator size increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedisplacement strokeVSAvoidactuator volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The segmented undulating profiles allow the actuator to achieve extended displacement stroke through the relative movement of peaks and valleys rather than requiring a proportionally larger overall actuator volume

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The undulating profiles introduce surface topology variations that effectively utilize the surface area dimension to achieve displacement range extension without linearly increasing the actuator's volumetric dimensions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Adaptability or versatility

If conventional flat opposed surfaces are used, then the actuator construction is simple, but the displacement range is limited to below 1 mm for practical force levels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedisplacement rangeVSAvoidsurface geometry
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The undulating profiles introduce controlled curvatures and surface variations to the otherwise flat opposed surfaces. These geometric modifications enable extended displacement range while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through standard machining or molding processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution extends the displacement range while maintaining a consistent rated force, reducing the actuator's mass by approximately two-thirds compared to conventional designs, making it more suitable for weight-conscious applications like aerospace.

Implementation Method 1

an armature attracted to a stator core... when the coil or coils are energised, relative movement in the direction of arrowheads is provided in an antagonistic relationship with magnetic attraction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic attraction: Magnetism

Implementation Method 2

the magnitude of the reluctance force at a given current varies approximately with the square of airgap width between opposed surfaces dependent upon such effects as saturation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic flux: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 3

variable airgap reluctance actuators... the magnitude of the reluctance force at a given current varies approximately with the square of airgap width

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReluctance force: Magnetic Reluctance

Data Source

PatentUS7876187B2Actuator
Publication Date: 2011.01.25 ROLLS ROYCE PLC
  • US7876187B2 patent drawing
  • US7876187B2 patent drawing
  • US7876187B2 patent drawing

AI summary

With variable airgap reluctance actuators problems arise due to the relationship between actuator mass and displacement range. By providing opposed surfaces in the actuator stator core and armature which have undulations typically in the form of grooves, slots and projections, a greater displacement range can be achieved whilst maintaining performance above a rated displacement force characteristic. In such circumstances by establishing a necessary rated displacement force characteristic, an actuator can be tailored and designed to meet that characteristic over a desired displacement range which has significantly less mass in comparison with a prior actuator arrangement having flat surfaces.