Uniax Geogrid Rib Orientation and Bar Structure Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional uniax geogrids have a significant amount of unoriented polymer in their bar structures, which reduces their mechanical efficiency and strength, as well as increases their weight, making them less effective for reinforcement applications where stress is primarily in one direction.

Innovation Solution

A uniax geogrid is produced by stretching a plastics sheet with a specific array of holes, where the rib structures are oriented along their lengths and the bar structures have a maximum stretch ratio of 1 in the transverse direction, with the rib segments having a stretch ratio of 5:1 to 12:1 and junctions having at least 40% of the rib segment's stretch ratio, allowing orientation across junctions and reducing unoriented polymer in bar segments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional uniax geogrids are produced by stretching plastics sheet with holes, then the rib structures provide reinforcement, but the bar structures contain significant unoriented polymer which reduces mechanical efficiency and increases weight

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical efficiencyVSAvoidweight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating the orientation requirements for different parts of the mesh structure. Rib structures are given high molecular orientation (stretch ratio 5:1 to 12:1) to maximize strength in the reinforcement direction, while bar structures are maintained with low or no orientation (stretch ratio ≤1:1) to minimize weight. This localized differentiation of material properties resolves the contradiction between achieving high mechanical efficiency in rib structures and reducing weight in bar structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If bar structures are stretched to increase orientation, then mechanical efficiency improves, but the transverse dimension control and junction integrity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical efficiencyVSAvoidtransverse dimension control
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements local quality by assigning different stretch ratio requirements to different structural elements. Bar structures are constrained to stretch ratios of ≤1:1 in the transverse direction to maintain dimensional control and junction integrity, while rib structures are allowed high stretch ratios (5:1 to 12:1) to achieve the desired molecular orientation and mechanical efficiency. This localized control resolves the contradiction between improving mechanical efficiency through orientation and maintaining manufacturing precision in transverse dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Stability of the object's composition

If junctions are stretched to achieve orientation continuity, then structural integrity improves, but the stretch ratio uniformity across the mesh deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidstretch ratio uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by permitting junctions to have different stretch ratio characteristics compared to rib segments. Junctions are allowed to exhibit lower stretch ratios and greater variability to maintain structural integrity and orientation continuity across the mesh, while rib segments maintain high and uniform stretch ratios (5:1 to 12:1) for optimal mechanical efficiency. This localized differentiation resolves the contradiction between achieving structural integrity through junction orientation and maintaining uniform stretch ratios across the entire mesh structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in improved strength properties and efficiency of geogrids by maximizing oriented polymer in rib segments and minimizing unoriented polymer in bar segments, enhancing their ability to withstand stress and maintain structural integrity.

Implementation Method 1

The stretching operation provides molecular orientation of the polymer in the stretching direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMolecular orientation:

Data Source

PatentEP2771178B1Mesh structure, production and uses thereof
Publication Date: 2018.02.07 TENSAR TECH
  • EP2771178B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2771178B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2771178B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A one-piece plastics material mesh structure (1), particularly a geogrid for use in geoengineering construction, is produced by stretching a plastics sheet starting material (20) formed with an array of holes (21). The mesh structure (1) comprises a plurality of generally parallel rib structures (2) extending longitudinally in a first direction parallel to the stretch direction (MD) and a plurality of generally parallel bar structures (3) extending in a second direction (TD) transverse to the rib structures (2). The rib structures (2) and said bar structures (3) are interconnected by junctions (5) at spaced locations along their respective lengths whereby the rib structures (2) are sub-divided along their length into alternating junctions (5) and rib segments (6) and the bar structures are sub-divided along their lengths by alternating bar segments (7) and junctions (5). In the mesh structure (1), (a) the rib structures (2) are such that the rib segments (6) are oriented in the first direction (MD) along their lengths and orientation in the first direction (MD) extends across the junctions (5) connecting two such oriented rib segments, and (b) the bar structures (3) are such that their overall stretch ratio in the second direction (TD) is a maximum of 1 and all locations along the length of the bar structures (3) have a maximum orientation of 1.5 in the second direction (TD).