Unified AI Model for Virtual Assistant Response Generation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing virtual assistant AI engines for local businesses struggle to accurately understand and interpret customer requests, access relevant systems of record, and coordinate with staff in real-time, especially when dealing with unique business workflows and limited training data.

Innovation Solution

A computerized method implementing a unified model that responds to customer messages by identifying suitable responses and notifications based on common or business-specific templates, using a multi-head attention-based binary classifier to determine the appropriateness of responses, and storing potential responses in a Document Store accessible through an Information Retrieval System.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional AI models are retrained for each business, then accuracy in understanding customer requests improves, but time consumption and computational resources increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy in understanding customer requestsVSAvoidtime for model retraining
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-generates multiple candidate responses (R,B) pairs and organizes them in a Document Store with associated query variations before actual customer interactions occur. This preliminary preparation eliminates the need for time-consuming retraining when new businesses are onboarded, as the framework can directly utilize pre-organized response candidates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of retraining foundational AI models for each business, the system creates business-specific virtual assistants by copying and adapting the unified framework structure. The framework generates business-customized responses by selecting from pre-generated candidates rather than retraining the entire model, significantly reducing time and computational resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Adaptability or versatility

If custom virtual assistants are created for each business, then adaptability to unique business workflows improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to business workflowsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs a universal unified framework that serves multiple businesses simultaneously. The framework generates business-specific virtual assistants by configuring the same core system with different business parameters, templates, and pre-generated response candidates, eliminating the need for separate complex systems for each business.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the virtual assistant creation process into modular components: a unified framework, business-specific configurations, template selections, and pre-generated response candidates. This segmentation allows each component to be independently managed and reused across different businesses, reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive training data is collected for each business, then model accuracy improves, but data collection time and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoiddata collection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-generates comprehensive response candidates and query variations in advance, organized in a Document Store. This preliminary action provides the model with sufficient training data structures before actual business operations begin, eliminating the need for time-consuming data collection during deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The unified framework automatically generates business-specific configurations and response candidates without requiring external data collection efforts. The system serves itself by creating the necessary training structures through automated processes rather than manual data gathering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If real-time coordination with staff is implemented, then customer service quality improves, but system complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomer service qualityVSAvoidcoordination system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and separates the notification function from the main AI processing workflow. Business notifications are generated as distinct outputs from the unified framework, allowing real-time staff alerts to be coordinated independently without complicating the core customer interaction processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20250173733A1Attention-based deep neural architectures for multi-point response generation in virtual business assistant ai engines
Publication Date: 2025.05.29 WEAVE COMMUNICATIONS INC
  • US20250173733A1 patent drawing
  • US20250173733A1 patent drawing
  • US20250173733A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In one aspect, a computerized-method for implementing a unified model that responds to an incoming customer message or request, comprising: given a user input message, U: identifying a response, R, that is to be sent to the customer, identifying a business notification, B, that is to be sent to the staff at the business, basing the response, R, and the business notification, B, on a common template or a business-specific template or a canned response defined by the business; wherein a unique (R,B) pair comprises a potential response to the input user message, U, storing a plurality of (R,B) pairs in a Document Store that is accessible through an Information Retrieval System; alongside the plurality of (R,B) pairs, storing a set of examples and a set of variations of the customer query, Q, for which each (R,B) pair of the plurality of (R,B) pairs is the appropriate response; given a query, Q: providing a plurality of corresponding (Q,R,B) triples.