Unified Cohesive Zone Model Dynamic Fracture Simulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fracture models face issues such as excessive computational cost and time discontinuities, limiting their effectiveness in simulating solid fractures.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a unified cohesive zone model (UCZM) within finite-discrete element methods (FDEM) that dynamically inserts cohesive elements based on a user-selectable transition threshold, using both stress and strain tensors to manage fracture initiation and propagation, allowing for a smooth transition between continuum and discontinuum mechanics modeling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional fracture models are used, then fracture simulation can be performed, but computational cost becomes excessive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefracture simulation accuracyVSAvoidcomputational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The model dynamically transitions between continuum and discontinuum mechanics based on a user-selectable threshold parameter. When the threshold is exceeded, cohesive elements are inserted to model fracture; below the threshold, continuum mechanics applies. This dynamic adaptation optimizes computational resources while maintaining simulation accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

A unified cohesive zone model with a user-selectable transition threshold parameter (ranging from 0 to 1) controls the transition between different mechanical modeling regimes. This parameter allows flexible adjustment of when cohesive elements are inserted, balancing computational cost and simulation fidelity for different material behaviors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If traditional fracture models are used, then fracture simulation can be performed, but time discontinuities occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefracture simulation accuracyVSAvoidtime continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The unified cohesive zone model ensures continuous transition between continuum and discontinuum mechanics by using a threshold-based insertion criterion for cohesive elements. This prevents abrupt time discontinuities while maintaining fracture simulation accuracy, as the model smoothly transitions between modeling regimes based on material state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Use of energy by moving object

If cohesive elements are dynamically inserted, then computational cost is optimized, but model complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational costVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The unified cohesive zone model serves multiple functions: it acts as both a continuum mechanics model and a discontinuum fracture model through the dynamic insertion of cohesive elements. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate modeling approaches while managing complexity through a single unified framework with a controllable threshold parameter.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12135925B1Libraries-based explicit fracture and fragmentation framework
Publication Date: 2024.11.05 TRIAD NATIONAL SECURITY LLC
  • US12135925B1 patent drawing
  • US12135925B1 patent drawing
  • US12135925B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Computer-implemented methods can include providing a numerical simulation mesh comprising a plurality of nodes and performing a numerical simulation of a solid material using the mesh and a user-selectable transition threshold associated with a cohesive zone model traction-separation relation. Additional computer-implemented methods can include performing a numerical simulation of a solid material using a numerical simulation mesh comprising a plurality of nodes, wherein the numerical simulation includes a transition threshold associated with a cohesive zone model traction-separation relation, and comparing local material states including a strain state of the mesh to the transition threshold during the performing the numerical simulation to determine whether to dynamically insert cohesive elements in the finite element mesh.