Unified Hardware Software Debugging Interface
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current debugging tools are often language-specific, requiring developers to use multiple debuggers for projects involving multiple programming languages, and integrated development environments (IDEs) typically support only seamless debugging within one programming language, making it inconvenient to debug applications implemented in multiple languages.
Innovation Solution
The system enables unified debugging by allowing users to define debugging information in a high-level programming language, which is then converted into lower-level languages such as C code or Java code, providing a unified interface for debugging applications that combine declarative and imperative programming languages, hardware code, and software code.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Adaptability or versatility
If multiple language-specific debuggers are used for multi-language projects, then debugging capability for each language is maintained, but device complexity and ease of operation deteriorate due to requiring multiple tools and switching between IDEs
Solution Approach 1:
The patent combines multiple language-specific debugging capabilities into a single unified debugger that can handle hardware description languages, compiled software languages, and interpreted languages simultaneously. This merging eliminates the need for multiple separate debugger tools while maintaining comprehensive debugging capability across all language types.
Solution Approach 2:
The unified debugger is designed with multi-functionality to support debugging of applications implemented in various programming languages including hardware description languages, compiled software languages, and interpreted languages. This universal approach allows a single tool to perform the roles of multiple specialized debuggers.
2Adaptability or versatility
If multiple language-specific debuggers are used for multi-language projects, then debugging capability for each language is maintained, but ease of operation worsens due to requiring to switch between IDEs
Solution Approach 1:
The patent combines multiple language-specific debugging capabilities into a single unified debugger that can handle hardware description languages, compiled software languages, and interpreted languages simultaneously. This merging eliminates the need for multiple separate debugger tools while maintaining comprehensive debugging capability across all language types.
Solution Approach 2:
The unified debugger is designed with multi-functionality to support debugging of applications implemented in various programming languages including hardware description languages, compiled software languages, and interpreted languages. This universal approach allows a single tool to perform the roles of multiple specialized debuggers.
3Ease of operation
If IDEs support seamless debugging within one programming language, then ease of operation is improved for single-language projects, but adaptability worsens when debugging applications in multiple languages
Solution Approach 1:
The unified debugger is designed with multi-functionality to support debugging of applications implemented in various programming languages including hardware description languages, compiled software languages, and interpreted languages. This universal approach allows a single tool to perform the roles of multiple specialized debuggers.
Solution Approach 2:
The system uses an intermediary approach by converting high-level debugging information into lower-level languages and utilizing a unified interface that can interpret and execute debugging commands across different language types, enabling seamless multi-language debugging without requiring language-specific tools.
Data Source
AI summary
A device receives information specifying a functional model that includes a set of variables and a set of computations, and receives debugging information associated with the functional model. The device generates computer code based on the set of computations associated with the functional model, the set of variables associated with the functional model, and the received debugging information. The device executes the generated computer code based on the debugging information.


