Unified Messaging Interface for Communication Devices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern communication systems face challenges in providing a seamless messaging experience across various devices due to the complexity of different message types, protocols, and formats, which confuses users and leads to frustration as they need to learn about multiple technical capabilities and limitations.

Innovation Solution

A unified messaging system that presents a single interface for multiple messaging services, allowing users to select abstract features without knowing specific message types, automatically determining and selecting the best message type for transmission, thereby simplifying the user experience and eliminating irrelevant options.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple message types and protocols are supported to provide comprehensive messaging services, then the system's adaptability and versatility are improved, but the device complexity and user confusion increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemessaging service coverageVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an abstract message type as an intermediary layer between the user and multiple concrete message types (SMS, MMS, email, etc.). This abstract layer unified the interface, allowing users to send messages without needing to know or select specific protocol types. The system automatically handles the complexity of multiple message types behind the scenes while presenting a simple, consistent interface to users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If users are provided with multiple message type options to suit different communication needs, then the adaptability is improved, but the ease of operation deteriorates as users must learn technical capabilities and limitations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemessage type selectionVSAvoiduser operation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the complexity of message type selection from the user interface. Instead of presenting users with multiple message type options and their technical specifications, the system removes this complexity by automatically selecting appropriate message types based on the communication context. Users simply compose their message without needing to understand or choose between SMS, MMS, email, or other protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Adaptability or versatility

If the system presents all available message types to users, then the adaptability is improved, but the loss of information increases as irrelevant options confuse users

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemessage type availabilityVSAvoidsignal to noise ratio
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by selectively presenting only the necessary message type options to users based on their specific communication context. Instead of overwhelming users with all possible message types, the system intelligently filters and presents only relevant options, reducing information overload while maintaining adaptability to different communication needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20150057037A1Unified and best messaging systems for communication devices
Publication Date: 2015.02.26 UNWIRED PLANET LLC
  • US20150057037A1 patent drawing
  • US20150057037A1 patent drawing
  • US20150057037A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A unified messaging system which can provide messaging services for a plurality of different “message types” is disclosed. The unified messaging system can serve as a single interface to a number of messaging services provided by various messaging components which use different message types (e.g., mail server). A unified message type is implemented and presented to a user as an abstract message. In addition, the unified messaging system can automatically determine, based on a first selected feature, if one or more message types should be used. A particular message type can also be automatically selected as a “best message type” based on one or more selected options.