Unified ML Workspace for Cross-Platform Data Aggregation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional machine learning project workspaces are hosted on different computing platforms, each tailored to specific stages of model development and maintenance, leading to incompatibility issues and the need for manual configuration across multiple disparate workspaces.

Innovation Solution

A compute agnostic project workspace is generated by a first party computing resource, which automatically creates and links third party workspaces, installing a first party routine set with webhooks to facilitate communication and data aggregation across multiple platforms from a centralized location.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple disparate third party workspaces are used for different stages of model development, then specialized functionalities for each stage are achieved, but system complexity and incompatibility between workspaces increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespecialized functionalitiesVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple disparate third party workspaces into a single unified workspace that provides access to specialized functionalities for different model development stages. The unified workspace aggregates data and controls multiple third party workspaces, eliminating the need to manually switch between incompatible systems while maintaining access to stage-specific capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The unified workspace serves as a universal platform that can handle multiple functions across different model development stages. It provides a single interface that can initiate, monitor, and control activities in various third party workspaces, making the system versatile without requiring separate specialized tools for each stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual configuration of multiple workspaces is performed, then optimal platform selection is achieved, but time consumption and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplatform optimizationVSAvoidconfiguration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The unified workspace automatically selects and configures the optimal set of third party platforms based on project requirements, eliminating manual configuration. The system self-manages the aggregation of data and coordination between workspaces, reducing both time consumption and operational complexity while maintaining optimized platform selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If data is transferred between multiple workspaces, then model development tasks are completed, but data aggregation and task coordination become difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask completionVSAvoiddata aggregation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The unified workspace acts as an intermediary that centralizes data aggregation and task coordination between multiple third party workspaces. Instead of data needing to be manually transferred between incompatible systems, the unified workspace serves as a central hub that automatically collects, aggregates, and coordinates information across all connected workspaces, improving both productivity and data integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20250037014A1Universal and machine learning model agnostic control and tracking
Publication Date: 2025.01.30 OPTUM INC
  • US20250037014A1 patent drawing
  • US20250037014A1 patent drawing
  • US20250037014A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various embodiments of the present disclosure provide universal machine learning tracking and control techniques for enforcing universal standards across a plurality of disparate machine learning projects within an enterprise. The techniques include generating a canonical representation of a machine learning model. The techniques include receiving model activity data from a third party computing resource in response to user activity within a third party workspace. The techniques include generating relative progress data for the machine learning model based on the model activity data and modifying the canonical representation of the machine learning model based on the model activity data and the relative progress data. The techniques include generating and providing a model interface point for the machine learning model in response to the canonical representation satisfying a publication threshold.