Unified Computing Network Management via Recursive UTM Architecture

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current management systems for computing networks lack a unified architecture to efficiently model and manage the interplay between communications networks, computer servers, and storage systems, leading to fragmented management techniques that are not well-suited for complex or large-scale computing networks.

Innovation Solution

The approach represents a computing network as a recursive structure of Universal Turing Machines (UTMs), files, and communication networks, where UTMs and files serve as sources and sinks of information, and communication networks transfer information, enabling unified management through a single system by extending existing models like ITU-T Recommendation G.800 to incorporate UTM models of computing resources and files.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If separate management systems are used for communications networks, computer servers, and storage systems, then each system can be managed with specialized techniques, but the overall computing network becomes difficult to manage in a unified manner

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanagement capabilityVSAvoidsystem architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges previously separate management systems for communications networks, computer servers, and storage systems into a unified management system. This is achieved by creating a common information model that can represent all three types of systems and their interrelationships, allowing a single management interface to control the entire computing network rather than requiring separate management tools for each component type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal management system that can handle multiple types of computing resources (networks, servers, storage) through a single interface. The common information model serves as a multi-functional framework that can represent diverse system types using consistent objects and relationships, enabling the management system to perform similar management functions across different resource types without requiring type-specific management logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If different architectures are used to model communications networks, computer servers, and storage systems, then each system can be optimized for its specific functions, but unified management becomes difficult to implement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanagement efficiencyVSAvoidmodeling architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal information model that can represent communications networks, computer servers, and storage systems using a common set of objects and relationships. This universal model allows unified management while maintaining the ability to represent the specific functional characteristics of each system type through appropriate object attributes and relationships within the same framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses parameter changes to adapt the common information model to represent different system types. By varying the values and combinations of parameters (object types, attributes, relationships) within the unified model, the system can represent the diverse characteristics of networks, servers, and storage systems without requiring separate architectural frameworks, thus achieving both unity and specificity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If separate management techniques are used for each computing network element, then each element can be managed with appropriate protocols, but the interplay between elements cannot be efficiently coordinated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanagement coordinationVSAvoidmanagement system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges separate management techniques into a coordinated unified system by creating a common information model that explicitly represents the interrelationships between networks, servers, and storage systems. This allows the management system to coordinate actions across different element types while maintaining the specialized protocols and techniques needed for each element type, achieving both coordination and technical appropriateness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS10057135B2Unified management of computing networks
Publication Date: 2018.08.21 CIENA CORP
  • US10057135B2 patent drawing
  • US10057135B2 patent drawing
  • US10057135B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for managing a computing network. At least a portion of the computing network is represented as a recursive architecture of elements representing bit transport, bit transformation and bit storage actions of the network. A respective set of one or more elements are associated with at least one system implementing functions of the portion of the computing network. The recursive architecture of elements is subsequently used to manage the at least one system implementing functions of the portion of the computing network.