Unified Progressive Jackpot System Across Casino Games

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Casino games have separate exclusive jackpots, limiting player excitement and potential winnings, as players can only contribute to individual game-specific jackpots rather than a unified progressive jackpot across different games.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a centralized progressive jackpot system that allows players to contribute to a single jackpot pool across various casino games, including Blackjack, Baccarat, Pai Gow Poker, and other card games, with specific hand combinations triggering varying jackpot amounts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If separate exclusive jackpots are maintained for each casino game, then game-specific jackpot integrity is preserved, but player excitement and potential winnings are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejackpot participation versatilityVSAvoidjackpot system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges separate game-specific jackpots into a unified progressive jackpot system. Multiple casino games (Blackjack, Baccarat, Pai Gow Poker, etc.) contribute to a single shared jackpot pool, allowing players to participate in one jackpot across different games. This combines previously separate jackpot systems into one integrated structure, increasing versatility while managing complexity through centralized control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The unified jackpot system serves multiple functions across different casino games. A single jackpot mechanism can be triggered by various qualifying hands from different game types, making the jackpot system universal rather than game-specific. This multi-functionality allows the same jackpot infrastructure to support diverse games while maintaining individual game rules and outcomes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Quantity of substance

If a unified progressive jackpot is implemented across multiple games, then player excitement and potential winnings increase, but system complexity and tracking requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejackpot pool sizeVSAvoidjackpot management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a centralized jackpot management system that acts as an intermediary between multiple games and the unified jackpot pool. This intermediary tracks contributions from various games, determines qualifying outcomes, and manages the progressive jackpot amount. By centralizing these functions, the system handles the complexity of tracking multiple game contributions while maintaining a single coherent jackpot structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the jackpot pool size parameter based on contributions from multiple games and qualifying outcomes. The jackpot amount progresses as games are played and resets or pays out when qualifying hands occur. This parameter change mechanism allows the jackpot pool to grow organically from multiple game sources while maintaining clear rules for accumulation and distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If multiple games contribute to a single jackpot, then jackpot win frequency and player engagement increase, but jackpot tracking and verification become more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejackpot contribution rateVSAvoidjackpot outcome verification difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the centralized jackpot system continuously monitors game outcomes, verifies qualifying hands, and updates the jackpot status accordingly. Each game provides feedback on player hands and outcomes, which the central system processes to determine jackpot eligibility. This feedback loop ensures accurate tracking across multiple games while maintaining verification integrity through systematic outcome validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10192404B2Device for managing a progressive jackpot
Publication Date: 2019.01.29 PARK JOHN
  • US10192404B2 patent drawing
  • US10192404B2 patent drawing
  • US10192404B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A jackpot wager that a player may qualify for as long as the player is playing on any of the designated games and places a jackpot wager. A player may participate in the jackpot while playing Blackjack, Pai Gow Poker or Baccarat and may either win a portion, percentage or the entire jackpot based on the qualifying hand dealt. The jackpot is not limited to the individual premise and may encompass multiple premises. The jackpot is not limited to the games listed but may be attached to all games to hands similar in frequency of being dealt. Card games are often now played in an electronic format online or utilizing an electronic gaming cabinet or video poker type machine. The present invention relates to a game that can be played both in the traditional format using a deck of cards or in an electronic format.