Unified Protocol Processing System for Network Packet Handling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional network architectures face inefficiencies due to data copying and task switching during packet processing across multiple layers, leading to complex and costly implementations, and are challenging to renumber without disrupting connections or losing packets.

Innovation Solution

The proposed solution treats each protocol data unit as a serial tape, dynamically binding syntax and updating state vectors based on Connection-endpoint-id indexing, allowing for reduced processing stages and efficient multiplexing, while enabling address changes without packet loss through multiple address assignment and recursive architecture design.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional multi-layer protocol processing is used, then protocol functionality is achieved, but data copying and task switching overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepacket processing efficiencyVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple protocol layers into a unified processing architecture where a single network processor handles functions traditionally distributed across multiple layers. This eliminates the need for separate processing stages and data copying between layers, directly resolving the contradiction by improving productivity while reducing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The network processor is designed with multi-functionality to handle various protocol operations (routing, switching, NAT, firewall) within a single processing unit. This universal approach allows the system to achieve protocol functionality without requiring specialized processing stages for each layer, thereby improving efficiency while simplifying the overall processing architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If address changes are implemented in traditional networks, then mobility is supported, but packet loss or connection disruption occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaddress change capabilityVSAvoidconnection stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an address translation mechanism that acts as an intermediary between the internal network addresses and external network addresses. This mediator allows address changes to occur without disrupting existing connections, as the translation layer absorbs the changes while maintaining stable connection endpoints for active communications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The address assignment system is designed to be dynamic, allowing addresses to be changed, reused, and reassigned without fixed bindings. This dynamic approach enables mobility and address flexibility while the system automatically manages the transitions to maintain connection stability, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If network renumbering is performed in traditional architectures, then address updates are achieved, but complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork renumbering capabilityVSAvoidrenumbering complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses address translation tables that act as copies or mappings between internal and external addresses. When renumbering is needed, only the translation tables need to be updated rather than reconfiguring the entire network infrastructure. This copying approach simplifies renumbering operations while maintaining full network functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The network processor automatically manages address translation and renumbering operations without requiring manual intervention or complex configuration procedures. The system self-adapts to address changes by automatically updating translation tables and maintaining connection state, thereby reducing the complexity and cost of network renumbering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12166674B2Method and system for managing network communications
Publication Date: 2024.12.10 TRIA NETWORKS SYST
  • US12166674B2 patent drawing
  • US12166674B2 patent drawing
  • US12166674B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system that incorporates teachings of the present disclosure may include, for example avoiding data copy and task switching by processing protocol headers of network PDUs as a serial tape to be processed in order such as by a single method. Other processing includes reducing stages and simplifying protocol processing and multiplexing during network communications. Address changing in an active network can be implemented by assigning multiple addresses to an entity so that a new address can replace the old address. Peer-to-peer application searching can be performed among networks that can be accessible or non-accessible networks. Utilizing anycast sets that include selected and alternative addresses to enable immediate or near immediate alternative route selection on failure or congestion. Other embodiments are disclosed.