Unified System of Record for Multi-Tenant Cloud Database

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional database systems are inefficient and prone to errors when handling multi-tenancy in cloud-based environments, requiring special processing and handling for transactions, leading to high costs and operational inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

A dynamically unified system of record is implemented, integrating independent and incompatible subsystems into a single unified system for seamless communication and management, using components like unified catalogs, stores, vaults, and pumps to ensure robust data storage and retrieval across multiple servers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional database systems are adapted to support multi-tenant solutions by layering support structures on top of single-tenant foundational technologies, then multi-tenancy capability is enabled, but system complexity and operational costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemulti-tenancy capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple independent and incompatible subsystems into a unified system of record, where all subsystems share a common data model, storage layer, and transaction processing mechanism. This eliminates the need for separate support structures for each subsystem and enables native multi-tenancy without layering complexity on top of single-tenant foundations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The unified system of record implements a universal data model and transaction processing engine that serves all subsystems simultaneously. This universal architecture handles multi-tenant requirements directly, eliminating the need for subsystem-specific adaptations and reducing overall system complexity while maintaining versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If conventional database systems implement special processing and handling for multi-tenant transactions, then multi-tenancy is supported, but operational efficiency decreases and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemulti-tenancy supportVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

By combining all subsystems into a unified system of record with shared transaction processing, the patent eliminates special handling requirements for multi-tenant transactions. The unified architecture processes all transactions through a single efficient pathway, regardless of tenant or subsystem origin, thereby maintaining high operational efficiency while supporting multi-tenancy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments multi-tenant data into logical namespaces within a unified physical storage structure. This segmentation allows efficient isolation and processing of tenant-specific transactions while leveraging the full power of the unified system, avoiding the overhead of separate processing paths required by conventional approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If independent and incompatible subsystems are integrated into a unified system of record, then data management efficiency and scalability improve, but integration complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata management efficiencyVSAvoidintegration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enforces homogeneity by requiring all subsystems to adhere to a common data model, storage interface, and transaction protocol. This standardized approach allows independent subsystems to be integrated into the unified system of record without complex custom integration logic, as each subsystem interfaces through the same unified mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #33Homogeneity

Solution Approach 2:

The unified system of record implements universal interfaces and data structures that work across all subsystems. This universality simplifies integration by providing a single integration pattern that works for all subsystems, regardless of their original incompatibilities, thereby improving data management efficiency without proportionally increasing integration complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If conventional systems are used in cloud-based environments, then existing infrastructure can be leveraged, but reliability and data protection against loss or corruption decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata protectionVSAvoidsystem architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The unified system of record implements beforehand cushioning through comprehensive data validation, consistency checks, and protective mechanisms built into the core architecture. These preventive measures protect against data loss and corruption before they can occur, enhancing reliability without requiring complex external safety systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Data Source

PatentUS11232083B2Facilitating dynamically unified system of record in an on-demand services environment
Publication Date: 2022.01.25 SALESFORCE INC
  • US11232083B2 patent drawing
  • US11232083B2 patent drawing
  • US11232083B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In accordance with embodiments, there are provided mechanisms and methods for facilitating dynamically unified system of record in an on-demand services environment in a multi-tenant environment according to one embodiment. In one embodiment and by way of example, a method includes integrating, by and incorporating into the database system, a plurality of subsystems into a unified system of record (“unified system), where each subsystem is independent of and incompatible with other subsystems of the plurality of subsystems, and collectively managing the plurality of subsystems, where collectively managing includes facilitating common communication within and between and uniform management of the plurality of subsystems based on common communication criteria and unified storage of data associated with the plurality of subsystems.