Unified Electronic Transaction Management System for Incompatible EDI

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current electronic transaction management systems face challenges in facilitating seamless communication between incompatible transactional systems, requiring costly custom programming and manual intervention, which limits the adoption and effectiveness of electronic data interchange (EDI) and other solutions.

Innovation Solution

A Unified Electronic Transaction Management System that employs a network-based software process, comprising a network-based application service and messaging applications associated with each transactional system, to translate data and formats, enabling electronic transactions between incompatible systems without modifying existing systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If custom programming is implemented to enable electronic transactions between incompatible systems, then transaction compatibility is improved, but implementation cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction compatibilityVSAvoidimplementation cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary translation layer that converts transactions between incompatible formats without requiring custom programming between each system pair. This mediator handles the compatibility issues centrally, reducing implementation costs while maintaining transaction compatibility across multiple systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal transaction format that can be used across multiple incompatible systems. By establishing a common intermediate format that multiple systems can translate to and from, the solution achieves broad compatibility without requiring custom integration for each system combination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If manual intervention is used to process electronic transactions, then processing accuracy is improved, but processing efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing accuracyVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements automated validation and error handling mechanisms that allow the system to self-correct common transaction errors without human intervention. This maintains high processing accuracy while enabling bulk automated processing, thereby improving efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback loops where transaction processing results are automatically validated and error patterns are learned from. This allows the system to improve accuracy over time through automated learning while maintaining high processing speeds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If existing transactional systems are modified to achieve compatibility, then system integration is improved, but system stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem integrationVSAvoidsystem stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an external translation layer that sits between incompatible systems without modifying them. This intermediary handles all format conversions and compatibility issues, allowing systems to remain unchanged and stable while achieving integration through the mediator.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent separates the integration functionality from the core transactional systems by creating a distinct translation layer. This segmentation allows the core systems to remain stable and unchanged while the translation layer handles all adaptation requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12284153B2Unified electronic transaction management system
Publication Date: 2025.04.22 SCHNITT DAVID
  • US12284153B2 patent drawing
  • US12284153B2 patent drawing
  • US12284153B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system for managing and automating the transactional processes between organizations that do business together using incompatible preexisting transactional systems. A centralized server manages transactions sent and received between the transactional systems of the organizations, and a software implemented messaging application communicates with the centralized server, both transmitting and receiving transactions from and to the transactional system of each organization, the result of which is improved automation of the transactional processes between organizations that do business together using incompatible preexisting transactional systems.