Unified Web Interface for Editorial Metadata Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing editorial review process for stored information is time-consuming and requires professional editors to use multiple editing tools, necessitating a more efficient system for managing and updating metadata across various applications.

Innovation Solution

A unified web interface with multiple application components that share data and communicate efficiently, allowing editors to perform editorial reviews through a consistent graphical user interface, reducing the need for manual data entry and tool switching.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If multiple editing tools are used to populate metadata fields, then editorial accuracy can be maintained, but the time required for editorial review increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeditorial accuracyVSAvoidtime required for editorial review
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple editing tools and applications into a single unified web interface. The system integrates metadata population functionality across different applications (e.g., case information, citation data, document metadata) into one cohesive interface, allowing editors to access and update all metadata fields through a single login and consistent user experience, thereby reducing the time required to switch between multiple tools while maintaining editorial accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The unified web interface provides universal access to multiple applications and metadata fields through a single consistent interface. The system enables editors to perform various editorial tasks (populating case metadata, updating citation information, editing document metadata) within the same interface framework, eliminating the need to learn and switch between multiple different editing tools

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If editors manually review and update metadata across multiple applications, then data accuracy can be maintained, but productivity decreases due to repetitive manual tasks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata accuracyVSAvoideditorial review efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements automated functions that perform editorial tasks without requiring manual intervention. Automated metadata population, cross-referencing, and validation processes automatically update database fields and maintain data accuracy across multiple applications, freeing editors from repetitive manual tasks and significantly improving productivity while maintaining or enhancing data accuracy through systematic automated processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The unified web interface provides real-time feedback to editors as they work. The system automatically validates metadata entries, checks for consistency across applications, and provides immediate confirmation of accurate data entry, enabling editors to maintain high data accuracy while working more efficiently through automated verification processes that reduce the need for time-consuming manual checking

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If a unified web interface is implemented, then ease of operation improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterface consistencyVSAvoidsystem architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The unified web interface acts as an intermediary layer between editors and the complex underlying database system. The web interface provides a simple, consistent user experience while the system architecture handles the complexity of connecting to multiple databases, applications, and data sources. This intermediary layer abstracts away the system complexity from the user, maintaining ease of operation while managing the necessary architectural complexity in the background

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS8799791B2System for use in editorial review of stored information
Publication Date: 2014.08.05 THOMSON REUTERS ENTERPRISE CENTRE GMBH
  • US8799791B2 patent drawing
  • US8799791B2 patent drawing
  • US8799791B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for use in editorial review of stored information includes a web interface adapted to provide a graphical user interface to a user. A first application component is adapted to run in the web interface. The first application component includes a first user interface component adapted to present information to a user and receive editorial content related to the information from the user. A first database communication component is adapted to communicate with a database containing the stored information and editorialize the stored information in the database in response to the editorial content received from the user. A first communication component is adapted to communicate within the web interface in response to the editorial content received from the user. A second application component is adapted to run in the web interface. The second application component includes a second user interface component adapted to present information to the user and receive editorial content related to the information from the user. A second communication component is adapted to communicate with first communication component. A second database communication component communicates with the database containing the stored information based upon data received from the first application component in response to the editorial content received from the user.