Unified Workspace Interface for Context-Aware Agent Assistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Enterprise software systems often require agents to navigate complex interfaces, leading to inefficiencies in resolving user incidents due to the need to open multiple GUI windows and manually input information, which hinders quick and effective assistance.

Innovation Solution

A user assistance system with a single GUI window that includes a dialog region for conversation, a service region for viewing records and accessing services, and a contextual action bar with context-specific actions, dynamically identifying relevant actions based on conversation and record analysis to streamline incident resolution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If multiple GUI windows are used for conversation and record viewing, then information completeness is improved, but interface complexity and time to navigate increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoidinterface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple previously separate GUI windows (conversation window, record viewing window, service access window) into a single integrated workspace window. This merging eliminates the need for agents to switch between multiple windows while maintaining access to all necessary information and functions, thereby reducing interface complexity without sacrificing information completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The single workspace window is designed to perform multiple functions simultaneously: displaying conversations, viewing user records, accessing services, and providing contextual actions. This multi-functional design allows the interface to maintain information completeness while reducing the overall number of windows and simplifying the interface structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Loss of information

If multiple GUI windows are used for conversation and record viewing, then information completeness is improved, but time to resolve incidents increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoidtime to resolve incidents
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

By merging multiple windows into a single workspace, the patent eliminates time spent switching between windows and maintaining multiple open applications. Agents can access all necessary information and perform actions within one unified interface, significantly reducing the time required to resolve incidents while maintaining complete information availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Manufacturing precision

If manual information input and copy/pasting are required, then data accuracy is improved, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata accuracyVSAvoidagent productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically retrieves and populates relevant information from user records into the conversation context without requiring manual input from agents. The contextual action bar provides automated suggestions and actions based on the conversation content, allowing the system to serve itself by reducing repetitive manual data entry while maintaining data accuracy through automated information retrieval.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-fetching and organizing relevant user information before the agent needs it. The contextual action bar proactively identifies potential actions and prepares relevant data, eliminating the need for agents to manually search, copy, and paste information, thereby improving productivity without compromising data accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Ease of operation

If contextual action bar with dynamic actions is provided, then ease of operation is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The contextual action bar is designed to be dynamic, automatically adjusting its content based on the conversation context, user records, and current state. This dynamic behavior provides ease of operation by presenting only relevant actions at each moment, while the underlying system complexity is managed through automated context analysis and adaptive interface generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11054972B2Context-based user assistance and service workspace
Publication Date: 2021.07.06 SERVICENOW INC
  • US11054972B2 patent drawing
  • US11054972B2 patent drawing
  • US11054972B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An example embodiment may involve generating and providing, for display on a graphical user interface, a single window that includes a dialog region, a service region, and a contextual action bar. The dialog region may include locations for displaying a conversation between a user and an agent, and for entering a message to be added to the conversation. The service region may be for displaying a workspace for viewing a record relating to the user and accessing services provided via a back-end system by way of a managed network. The contextual action bar may include one or more selectable context-specific actions. The embodiment may also involve analyzing at least one of the conversation, the record relating to the user, and the services to identify contextual terms. The embodiment may also involve, based on the contextual terms, generating and providing, for display on the contextual action bar, a selectable context-specific action.